Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
7. About the numbers
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 10:41 PM
Feb 2016

I assume that the reported numbers reflect the totals AFTER the viability weeding-out. If anyone tabulated the expressed initial preferences, I think O'Malley would have done much better. What kneecapped his showing was that, in many precincts, he failed to reach 15% and so was recorded at zero for that precinct. His actual supporters just went home or were counted as supporting their second choice.

He would certainly have done much better in New Hampshire, a straightforward primary without these arcane caucus complications. For that reason, I too was surprised that he suspended. I thought he would at least hang on for eight days to see how New Hampshire went.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Martin O'Malley»Well, group, it's been a ...»Reply #7