Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Populist Reform of the Democratic Party

Showing Original Post only (View all)

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 07:41 PM Nov 2014

Take names. These are the Dem Senators who voted FOR Keystone: [View all]

YEAs:
Begich (D-AK)
Bennet (D-CO)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Donnelly (D-IN)
Hagan (D-NC)
Heitkamp (D-ND)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Manchin (D-WV)
McCaskill (D-MO)
Pryor (D-AR)
Tester (D-MT)
Walsh (D-MT)
Warner (D-VA)
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&session=2&vote=00280

These are the Democratic Senators who are willing to promote the huge LIE that the Keystone Pipeline "creates jobs and energy independence".

Remember who the liars are.

54 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I knew Bennet would vote yes before the vote. 2016 is coming. Autumn Nov 2014 #1
no excusevfor begich. he lost roguevalley Nov 2014 #18
Isn't that how they do it? In the Lame Duck Congress they push through policies sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #34
Pryor (Arkansas) lost his race too. bvar22 Nov 2014 #43
This message was self-deleted by its author guyton Nov 2014 #27
I just sent him a letter, for all the good it will do. CrispyQ Nov 2014 #39
Thanks for that. Interested to see "my" Senator (Casey) on the list. (nt) enough Nov 2014 #2
The third way rot within the Dem party. L0oniX Nov 2014 #3
yep. Phlem Nov 2014 #11
Why McCaskill? oldtime dfl_er Nov 2014 #4
Check her campaign contributors? scarletwoman Nov 2014 #5
I am thinking of... 3catwoman3 Nov 2014 #25
I'm not surprised. Ino Nov 2014 #22
Excellent "collection"! Thank you! scarletwoman Nov 2014 #28
Unfortunately, not until 2018. Ino Nov 2014 #33
I'm not surprised at all to see her on that list. People have been a bit fooled by McCaskill. I sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #35
K/R and thanks for posting, scarletwoman! NYC_SKP Nov 2014 #6
They serve a different Master. scarletwoman Nov 2014 #8
Litmus test for a New Democratic Party - no fucking liars allowed. Liars names noted. Fred Sanders Nov 2014 #7
Thank you. That's exactly how I feel. scarletwoman Nov 2014 #10
+1 Scuba Nov 2014 #15
The PRG 50 State Strategy should make certain that these conservatives masquerading as rhett o rick Nov 2014 #49
I assume that the R's voted 100% in favor. These are Democrats in Name Only. rhett o rick Nov 2014 #9
+1 Scuba Nov 2014 #16
No surprise to see Casey on the list. dino nt Mnemosyne Nov 2014 #12
Now, which ones are up for election in 2016??? TheNutcracker Nov 2014 #13
Well, Hagan is gone..(although her replacement would have voted the same) KoKo Nov 2014 #14
No surprises here. They're Demoncrats, not Democrats. nt valerief Nov 2014 #17
Obviously they don't care about the Great Sioux Nation Rosa Luxemburg Nov 2014 #19
See these people these are Conservative. PatrynXX Nov 2014 #20
So happy to see.... 99Forever Nov 2014 #21
Which ones are lame duck? ErikJ Nov 2014 #23
Here's the ones that still have a job come January demwing Nov 2014 #24
And that will be more than enough to get them to 60 vi5 Nov 2014 #40
I think you misunderstood me demwing Nov 2014 #41
Understood. vi5 Nov 2014 #42
Then I misunderstood you! demwing Nov 2014 #44
Warner got re-elected too RedstDem Nov 2014 #51
Every one of these need to go. onecaliberal Nov 2014 #26
Yes, I agree, but how to fight the money they will have behind them? Which is how they got there sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #36
What does it take to change out the Party Leadership? nm rhett o rick Nov 2014 #50
The entire base threatening to quit the party unless they get some real Democratic Leadership. sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #52
I just voted for Warner, but the alternative was even worse. Sucks williesgirl Nov 2014 #29
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #30
Gee, those 50 jobs really need to get spread around thinly, don't they? merrily Nov 2014 #31
kick glinda Nov 2014 #32
K&R! Thank you for naming names, scarletwoman! Enthusiast Nov 2014 #37
Democratic flotsam. nt ladjf Nov 2014 #38
Bastards. hotrod0808 Nov 2014 #45
Looksl like at least half of them had nothing to lose, the voters already kicked them out. But sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #46
Kicking this again as those names should not be forgotten. sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #47
Thank you. I agree, these names should not be forgotten. nt scarletwoman Nov 2014 #48
k and r. these people are like cancers. bbgrunt Nov 2014 #53
Kicking this so we don't forget those names, especially the ones who are still there n/t sabrina 1 Jan 2015 #54
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»Take names. These are the...»Reply #0