Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Atheists & Agnostics
Showing Original Post only (View all)"Cardinal: Abortion is bigger sin than priest abuse" [View all]
An excerpt follows. The full article is here.
Cardinal: Abortion is bigger sin than priest abuse
Advice for Cardinal Pell: When youre talking about coverups of child rape, its best to stick with apologizing
MARY ELIZABETH WILLIAMS
...
But though Pell says he never directly covered up abuse and that he is committed to working to make improvements, Pells track record tells a different story. Twenty years ago, Pell appeared in court with his colleague Father Gerald Francis Ridsdale while Ridsdale was on trial for sexual abuse. Ridsdale was eventually convicted of molesting and raping 40 children over a 26-year period. At the inquiry this week, Cardinal Pell defended his support for Ridsdale, saying, At that stage nobody knew well, I certainly didnt what proved to be the full extent of his infamous career. I did know that there was a very significant number of charges but I had no idea about all the other things that would unfold. During the same period, Pell continued to authorize payment of a frugal allowance to Father Ronald Pickering after Pickering fled to England in the wake of sex abuse allegations and refused to cooperate with authorities. It was Pells successor who stopped the payments and launched an investigation.
...
And although, when he spoke on Monday, Pell said, I am fully apologetic and absolutely sorry, his degree of not-getting-it is still pretty staggering. Pell insisted, I dont believe we have a moral obligation to increase the settlement amounts for sex abuse victims. And in an epic case of poor timing, he railed against 25 years of hostility from the press and noted that the Australian government was not active earlier in pursuing sexual abuse cases. He also, outrageously, declared, Ive sometimes said, if wed been gossips which we werent and we had talked to one another about the problems that were there we would have realised earlier just how widespread this awful business was.
Heres a hint: When youre talking about systematic coverups of child rape, its best to stick with apologizing. Its good to remember that you can admit youve made mistakes without making the ludicrous, easily refuted claim that youve always been on the side of the victims, or humble bragging that the real problem is that you werent gossips. Doing the morally and legally responsible thing of acting when someone is abusing children is not, by the way, gossip. And you want to consider, while youre explaining yourself to the world, that you still have much soul searching yet to do. Because right now, Pell remains a harrowing example of the evil of complacency.
Perhaps the most telling moment of Pells appearance wasnt anything he said about the crimes on his colleagues or the litigation of victims. Instead it was when, on Monday, the deputy chairman of the committee, Frank McGuire, asked Pell point-blank, Were you guilty of willful blindness? And the man of God answered him confidently, I certainly wasnt.
Advice for Cardinal Pell: When youre talking about coverups of child rape, its best to stick with apologizing
MARY ELIZABETH WILLIAMS
...
But though Pell says he never directly covered up abuse and that he is committed to working to make improvements, Pells track record tells a different story. Twenty years ago, Pell appeared in court with his colleague Father Gerald Francis Ridsdale while Ridsdale was on trial for sexual abuse. Ridsdale was eventually convicted of molesting and raping 40 children over a 26-year period. At the inquiry this week, Cardinal Pell defended his support for Ridsdale, saying, At that stage nobody knew well, I certainly didnt what proved to be the full extent of his infamous career. I did know that there was a very significant number of charges but I had no idea about all the other things that would unfold. During the same period, Pell continued to authorize payment of a frugal allowance to Father Ronald Pickering after Pickering fled to England in the wake of sex abuse allegations and refused to cooperate with authorities. It was Pells successor who stopped the payments and launched an investigation.
...
And although, when he spoke on Monday, Pell said, I am fully apologetic and absolutely sorry, his degree of not-getting-it is still pretty staggering. Pell insisted, I dont believe we have a moral obligation to increase the settlement amounts for sex abuse victims. And in an epic case of poor timing, he railed against 25 years of hostility from the press and noted that the Australian government was not active earlier in pursuing sexual abuse cases. He also, outrageously, declared, Ive sometimes said, if wed been gossips which we werent and we had talked to one another about the problems that were there we would have realised earlier just how widespread this awful business was.
Heres a hint: When youre talking about systematic coverups of child rape, its best to stick with apologizing. Its good to remember that you can admit youve made mistakes without making the ludicrous, easily refuted claim that youve always been on the side of the victims, or humble bragging that the real problem is that you werent gossips. Doing the morally and legally responsible thing of acting when someone is abusing children is not, by the way, gossip. And you want to consider, while youre explaining yourself to the world, that you still have much soul searching yet to do. Because right now, Pell remains a harrowing example of the evil of complacency.
Perhaps the most telling moment of Pells appearance wasnt anything he said about the crimes on his colleagues or the litigation of victims. Instead it was when, on Monday, the deputy chairman of the committee, Frank McGuire, asked Pell point-blank, Were you guilty of willful blindness? And the man of God answered him confidently, I certainly wasnt.
24 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Translation: "Our sins are completely rational and understandable. Yours are heinous."
Warpy
May 2015
#5
All pro-life (conforming) Catholics surely believe the same. He is just being honest
whatthehey
May 2015
#6
You know I had people Defend the Duggars using the 'You liberals abort babies' arguement
LynneSin
May 2015
#12
A priest being the best reason you wouldn't subject someone to religion. Stinkin' pedophile. n/t
jtuck004
May 2015
#13
I just learned in GD that I should withhold any disparaging remarks against the RCC as to not
PeaceNikki
May 2015
#22