Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bretton Garcia

(970 posts)
37. The crux for me?
Mon Feb 18, 2019, 02:42 PM
Feb 2019

If something can't be shown to be true or false either, or if it has no definite observable results, then it is 1) moot. Or say, 2) useless. And 3) most probably false.

4) When promises of physical miracles failed, much of Christianity switched to promising only spiritual results, in our heads. But even the Bible warned there are many bad, false spirits, that delude our heads with illusions. 5) So we are not supposed to have so much faith; we are supposed "test the spirits" even. With "science" Dan. 1.4-15 KJE.

So the Christianity that stresses faith and spirituality is not ultimately biblical. And it is of course anti rational as well.

Are we all "sons" of God? guillaumeb Feb 2019 #1
Define the divine... MineralMan Feb 2019 #2
To divine the divine is the work of a lifetime. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #3
Nah... MineralMan Feb 2019 #4
Your answer apparently "works" for you. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #5
Here we go..🙄 sprinkleeninow Feb 2019 #10
Many do not 'get it'. And they may never. no text sprinkleeninow Feb 2019 #11
Or, they put such obstacles in the way, guillaumeb Feb 2019 #19
Redefining God as beyond evidence, reason, proofs, .. Bretton Garcia Feb 2019 #28
IIRC there was a major debate in 80s? re validity of claims that can't be falsified bobbieinok Feb 2019 #31
Popper, Wittgenstein, Russell started it off? Bretton Garcia Feb 2019 #33
I think Hume did. marylandblue Feb 2019 #34
The Parable of the Invisible Gardener--John Wisdom, Antony Flew bobbieinok Feb 2019 #35
The crux for me? Bretton Garcia Feb 2019 #37
Or, an admission that human intelliegence is not capable of understanding? eom guillaumeb Feb 2019 #38
Or a willful embrace of ignorance, intellectual fatalism and laziness, as sacred Bretton Garcia Feb 2019 #39
Or an embrace of human intelligence as the substitute for a deity. eom guillaumeb Feb 2019 #40
Why would human intelligence substitute for a deity? marylandblue Feb 2019 #41
No evidence? MineralMan Feb 2019 #16
In your mind, you are indeed "correct". guillaumeb Feb 2019 #18
I thought that was the metaphorical part. (nt) NeoGreen Feb 2019 #22
Well done. eom guillaumeb Feb 2019 #23
In other words, you refuse to do so Major Nikon Feb 2019 #15
Each believer must do so. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #17
You were asked to define a word YOU used yourself as YOU define it, not "others" Major Nikon Feb 2019 #20
The creator, if you believe in such, naturally creates... Thomas Hurt Feb 2019 #6
Easy. Act_of_Reparation Feb 2019 #29
Or, if you have problems with spelling... MineralMan Feb 2019 #30
Nope. Voltaire2 Feb 2019 #13
He's more complex: LongtimeAZDem Feb 2019 #7
Pretty much sums it up. Ferrets are Cool Feb 2019 #8
Patti Smith: "Jesus died for somebody's sins, 3Hotdogs Feb 2019 #21
That's great! Glamrock Feb 2019 #26
jesus is Hercules plus a few other mix and match... NeoGreen Feb 2019 #9
Interesting. Thanks for link. bobbieinok Feb 2019 #12
That webpage is useless as scholarship struggle4progress Feb 2019 #25
Are we to suppose that the ... NeoGreen Feb 2019 #42
Genuine studies of cultural histories are interesting and informative. But struggle4progress Feb 2019 #43
I could say the same thing about anyone... NeoGreen Feb 2019 #44
Here is Richard Carrier on Graves: struggle4progress Feb 2019 #45
Ok, I get it... NeoGreen Feb 2019 #46
I like genuine scholarship, where actual facts lead to conclusions, struggle4progress Feb 2019 #47
So, does this mean I can assume you discount... NeoGreen Feb 2019 #49
I've been posting here at DU for fifteen years. In that time, struggle4progress Feb 2019 #50
Ok, good... NeoGreen Feb 2019 #53
The literalists take the view that the texts must be accepted as accurate accounts struggle4progress Feb 2019 #54
Agreed, and would add... NeoGreen Feb 2019 #55
The sons of Greek gods were generally demi-gods Major Nikon Feb 2019 #14
Could the Greek Gods be Nephilim? ... spin Feb 2019 #51
It is more subversive. The rulers often called themselves struggle4progress Feb 2019 #24
"A bit different, but not so very different" doesn't make for a long enough sermon RockRaven Feb 2019 #27
Zeus' kids knew how to party. Act_of_Reparation Feb 2019 #32
Yes, sermons heard. Igel Feb 2019 #36
*record scratch* trotsky Feb 2019 #48
"The NT strongly implies that Jesus pre-existed" Voltaire2 Feb 2019 #52
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»How is 'Jesus Son of God...»Reply #37