Busnesses that go gun free will be liable for safety of CCW holders

[DonP]

83. I didn't; now try reading it again slowly, feel free to move your lips if it helps

I said;

"If bars can be held responsible for over serving someone that leaves and causes an accident. (dram shop laws)

Then a business that chooses to deny the right to carry where it's legal, can be held at least partially responsible for anything that happens on their property.

After all, a lot of folks want to hold gun makers responsible for 3rd party actions. This is the same thing."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1172&pid=196782

Somehow, you came up with; "A bar faces no liability for not serving alcohol". Something no one said. Oh, and it's "stupid" and I should be ashamed, blah, blah etc., without elaborating on why, not that you could anyway.

If all they do is paste a frickin' sign on a window, magically declaring it is a gun free zone and absolving them of any responsibility, then forbid licensed people from carrying, they should be held at least partially liable for their safety. Seems a lot of voters in Tennessee feel the same way and don't give a crap what anyone else thinks.

Locations with real security, courthouses, airports etc. have screening with metal detectors, x-rays, not just good wishes and failed hopes.

But feel free to send a check to gun control this morning and tell them that you want that damn stupid Tennessee law reversed. We'll wait here and watch.

No wonder gun control is such a train wreck with logic and insight like this involved.