Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
Sun May 1, 2016, 07:42 PM May 2016

Gun maker wants industry to give 'smart guns' a shot [View all]

DAYTONA BEACH, Fla. (AP) — Jonathan Mossberg is among a small number of pioneers looking to build a safer gun. But unlike many others, he was in the gun business when he started down that path.

His family is renowned for its premier line of shotguns treasured by law enforcement, hunters and the military. Mossberg already has spent more than a decade working to develop — and someday bring to the market — a firearm that the wrong person cannot fire. It is intended to work without fail in the hands of its owner in a life-or-death situation.

"We're gun people, so we know when you pick up a gun you want to shoot it," Mossberg said. "You don't want to swipe your finger. You don't want to talk to it. In an emergency situation, you want to pick it up and use it."

Mossberg's iGun Technology Corp., based in Daytona Beach, Florida, relies on a simple piece of jewelry — a ring — that "talks" to a circuit board imbedded in a firearm to let it know the user is authorized. The ring must be within centimeters of the gun for the gun to fire.

http://www.masslive.com/news/index.ssf/2016/05/gun_maker_wants_industry_to_gi.html
56 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fine Duckhunter935 May 2016 #1
No problem as long as there are no mandates. nt hack89 May 2016 #2
This is a good product and woks instantly and as reliably as the same shotgun without flamin lib May 2016 #3
Unless ... Straw Man May 2016 #4
Your argument is sooooooooo tedious. flamin lib May 2016 #5
Tedious it may very well be, but you haven't actually refuted it friendly_iconoclast May 2016 #6
Thats going to leave a mark. beevul May 2016 #8
Barring further explanation, I say that endorsement of the shotgun is a) phony, or... friendly_iconoclast May 2016 #11
Yes, facts are so tedious, aren't they? Straw Man May 2016 #9
Do you see and hear those warnings Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #16
Or your wife needs it... ileus Sep 2016 #13
The battery dies Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author CompanyFirstSergeant May 2016 #7
Fine with me. If it works, folks will scarf 'em up. nt Eleanors38 May 2016 #10
I bet some figures out how to hack it. Hangingon Sep 2016 #12
Forgive my vacuum tube tech, but I remember the old "pulse" notion... Eleanors38 Sep 2016 #17
Cheap does not come into it. Hangingon Sep 2016 #19
Prohibition WILL go unchecked if not opposed... Eleanors38 Sep 2016 #20
Eh? Looks like word salad to me. nt flamin lib Sep 2016 #22
Ears wide shut, eh? Eleanors38 Sep 2016 #24
What do you expect from somebody that thinks the AR15 is a military issue weapon? DonP Sep 2016 #25
I know, isn't that the person Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #26
Yup, The "World's Foremost Authority" in Castle Bansalot - not a high bar DonP Sep 2016 #32
IMNSHO some of the usual suspects... discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2016 #33
After having their hat handed to them for 3 or 4 years ... DonP Sep 2016 #35
re: "I don't believe it "jumped" 12 points in 2 years." discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2016 #36
I never believed it dropped off after '94 either DonP Sep 2016 #44
re: "Nobody's suggesting a mass confiscation of Persian Kittens ... at least not yet." discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2016 #46
If he read what I said, he would have paid close attention to the last 2 sentences. Eleanors38 Sep 2016 #28
Uh, no. Just hard to follow all the conspiracy and try follow any thread of reason. flamin lib Sep 2016 #29
I suggest that *you* remember that you run neither this website nor this group... friendly_iconoclast Sep 2016 #30
Speaking of this DEMOCRATIC sarisataka Sep 2016 #34
Says the supporter of a group that just endorsed 2 repukes. N/T beevul Sep 2016 #37
I am sure that poster Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #43
Wow, so now you think you are a host here in this group? Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #42
i trust mossberg beergood Sep 2016 #14
I may be misunderstanding, but I think... benEzra Sep 2016 #18
understood beergood Sep 2016 #21
Uh, no. nt flamin lib Sep 2016 #23
Is it on the market or an introduction date set yet, been 6 months Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #27
iGun says they won't introduce it until mandates are off the table. benEzra Sep 2016 #41
I agree with mandates Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #45
Wouldn't that be disagreeing with mandates? N/T beevul Sep 2016 #50
Badly worded Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #52
It's been five months since you endorsed it. Have you managed to actually test it yet? friendly_iconoclast Sep 2016 #31
This message was self-deleted by its author benEzra Sep 2016 #39
Uh, yes. I just checked. Jonathan Mossberg runs a small startup (iGun), not O.F. Mossberg. benEzra Sep 2016 #38
It is ironic that the people who want to throw their neighbors in jail... benEzra Sep 2016 #40
I doubt very much the OP and his second banana care for *this* quote from Jonathan Mossberg: friendly_iconoclast Sep 2016 #47
But, but, it's as reliable as his $35,000 Pick em Up truck! DonP Sep 2016 #48
If he returns to tout the Electro-Mossberg again, be sure to remind him of Mossberg's own words friendly_iconoclast Sep 2016 #49
Now who could that quote be from? Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #53
Good luck to this guy... deathrind Sep 2016 #51
Do you agree with what he said in an interview last year?: friendly_iconoclast Sep 2016 #54
Yes. deathrind Sep 2016 #55
Of course, Mossberg is secretly forging one ring to control them all . . . LongtimeAZDem Sep 2016 #56
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Gun maker wants industry ...»Reply #0