Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

Showing Original Post only (View all)

JohnyCanuck

(9,922 posts)
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 06:06 AM Nov 2014

The End of the Road for NIST [View all]

The End of the Road for NIST
By Tony Szamboti

Editor's Note: In recent years, various members of the AE911Truth team have been working on a white paper titled “Areas of Specific Concern in the NIST WTC Reports.” Last month they finally completed the document. Its 25 concise points offer the most convincing proof that the reports produced by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) on the September 11, 2001, destruction of the three World Trade Center buildings were unscientific and fraudulent. The authors of "The 25 Points" designed the document to provide material that would compel the convening of a grand jury. Whether or not a grand jury is ever impaneled in any jurisdiction, though, readers of this white paper have the duty and privilege of acting as a virtual grand jury in all jurisdictions. After weighing the evidence meticulously laid out in "The 25 Points," readers can, by their resulting actions, help determine whether there will one day be a new, fully funded, truly independent, wholly transparent, and unimpeachably honest investigation of 9/11.

Areas of Specific Concern in the NIST WTC Reports

Below is a series of twenty-five provable points which clearly demonstrate that the reports produced by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) on the destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) were unscientific and fraudulent. Therefore NIST itself – including its lead authors, Shyam Sunder and John Gross - should be investigated.

1. OMISSION OF GIRDER STIFFENERS SHOWN ON FRANKEL DRAWING #9114 2
2. OMISSION OF THREE LATERAL SUPPORT BEAMS ON THE 13TH FLOOR G3005 BEAM 2
3. WTC 7 COLLAPSE AT FREE-FALL ACCELERATION IS NOT EXPLAINED 3
4. VIDEOS OF THE COLLAPSE OF WTC 7 BETRAY NIST’S COMPUTER MODEL 3
5. CLAIMS OF INVESTIGATING CONTROLLED DEMOLITION WITHOUT TESTING FOR EXPLOSIVE RESIDUES 4
6. CHANGES OF STATEMENTS ON COMPOSITE BEAMS AND SHEAR STUD USE BETWEEN DRAFTS 5
7. REFUSING OF FOIA REQUESTS

More: http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/926-25-points-of-specific-concern-in-the-nist-wtc-reports.html
50 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The End of the Road for NIST [View all] JohnyCanuck Nov 2014 OP
k/r nationalize the fed Nov 2014 #1
I am sure NIST is sad at their impending demise. hack89 Nov 2014 #2
So explain to me how an independent 9/11 investigation take place. hack89 Nov 2014 #3
Here are some ideas nationalize the fed Nov 2014 #4
NIST could put all the questions to rest gyroscope Nov 2014 #5
Because NIST didn't conduct the criminal investigation? hack89 Nov 2014 #6
NIST was responsible for investigating WHY the towers collapsed, genius gyroscope Nov 2014 #9
But the FBI tested and found nothing hack89 Nov 2014 #11
You're just making crap up as you go along gyroscope Nov 2014 #13
no they were not "paint chips"! wildbilln864 Nov 2014 #38
Ten years gone and nothing new hack89 Nov 2014 #39
guess you know that from your own experience eh hack? wildbilln864 Nov 2014 #46
I miss the old days - we use to have a lot of fun hack89 Nov 2014 #49
Yes, they were paint chips William Seger Nov 2014 #40
again all you have is denial! unless you can link please! n/t wildbilln864 Nov 2014 #45
Again? William Seger Nov 2014 #48
Why wouldn't they have used high explosives? hack89 Nov 2014 #12
If they had bothered to look into it instead of trying to cover it up gyroscope Nov 2014 #14
Large tall buildings are easier hack89 Nov 2014 #15
You ignored the part about gyroscope Nov 2014 #16
So you discount the eye witness accounts of explosions? hack89 Nov 2014 #17
Try to pay attention gyroscope Nov 2014 #18
But we have been told for ten years that explosives were used hack89 Nov 2014 #19
I said no such thing gyroscope Nov 2014 #20
So if they used RDX hack89 Nov 2014 #21
What an absurd thing to say gyroscope Nov 2014 #22
Falling in its footprint is the easy part hack89 Nov 2014 #23
But according to the NIST report gyroscope Nov 2014 #24
I think you actually need to read the NIST report hack89 Nov 2014 #25
No airplane hit Tower 7 gyroscope Nov 2014 #26
You want to discount the fire hack89 Nov 2014 #27
"Enough the weaken the steel." gyroscope Nov 2014 #28
In post #25, hack calls that a "collapse" nationalize the fed Nov 2014 #30
The Beijing building is still in use today gyroscope Nov 2014 #32
Your first picture shows the concrete core standing while the steel portions collapsed hack89 Nov 2014 #37
Windsor had a concrete core. The steel portions collapsed. hack89 Nov 2014 #33
The claim that the towers should have collapsed like falling trees is ludicrous. AZCat Nov 2014 #36
Doesn't matter if its a tree or a highrise building gyroscope Nov 2014 #41
"random office fire" zappaman Nov 2014 #42
Special Magical Fire! gyroscope Nov 2014 #43
Special Magical Fire makes sense! zappaman Nov 2014 #44
You have quite an imagination gyroscope Nov 2014 #47
Your post doesn't address my argument at all. AZCat Nov 2014 #50
Maybe this was never an issue because there was no evidence of explosives? AZCat Nov 2014 #8
Are you a psychic or clairvoyant? gyroscope Nov 2014 #10
Fortunately for incident investigators everywhere... AZCat Nov 2014 #29
Oh boy this is always interesting. AZCat Nov 2014 #7
Here's what these posters mean by nationalize the fed Nov 2014 #31
Here on the internet I'm just an anonymous poster. AZCat Nov 2014 #34
Oh, and there are many more threads with Tony's participation still on DU2 if people care to look. AZCat Nov 2014 #35
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»The End of the Road for N...»Reply #0