Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: Architects & Engineers for Truth! [View all]superbeachnut
(381 posts)How do you train eyewitnesses to identify melted steel? Is it a special course. Too bad you have no hard evidence, you have hearsay. Which eyewitness did you verify, and how did you verify the steel was melted, flowing. You already debunked the video showing corroded steel, by reading the report, it clearly explains the steel was below melting point, at or below 1000C, and thus not melted steel. Was the eutectic confusing.
Eyewitnesses saw melted steel, or molten steel? Did they take samples of the steel flowing, or did they start on fire from being so close?
How did you verify they saw melted steel. Wait, molten steel.
Yes, fires burned for week, if not months because there were over 220 acres of office contents, cars, gasoline, oil, tires burning in the pile. Fires burn for weeks. Thermite burns up in seconds, like a sparkler.
Office contents burning before collapse of the WTC towers were equal in heat energy to over 2,700 tons of thermite. Paper has more heat energy than thermite. Science debunks the false claim video.
Cry, I know the WTC was a fire caused gravity collapse, I use physics and fire science, not woo made up by paranoid conspiracy theorists Gage cherry picked because they believe in fantasy.
All I have is science - Gage has lies.
This is why Gage's lack of evidence has failed to produce anything more than fooling a fringe few, on the Internet; where all is true
How much melted steel was there? Where is it, no melted steel was found, or recycled on 911. Where did the melted steel go?
Where is the photo of a big chunk of melted steel? Aluminum was found, but no melted steel. Looks like the eyewitnesses were wrong, not qualified to identify steel flowing like a river - how hot is that river? Remember, thermite burns for seconds, wood and office fires can burn for months, if you have over 220 acres of office space crushed up into a few acres, a big pile.