Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Creative Speculation
Showing Original Post only (View all)SKEPTIC - The Physics of UFOs [View all]
An article by Michael K. Gainer about the feasibility of interstellar travel, followed by a rebuttal from Peter Huston:
http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/13-01-16/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Skepticcom+(Skeptic.com)#feature
snips:
(from the Michael Gainer article)
When UFOs are reported they should be evaluated with the attitude that alien spacecraft cannot exist. This is not closed mindedness. It is facing the reality of the constraints that time, stellar distances, and available energy place on interstellar space travel. We must also face the reality that human travel beyond the limits of the solar system is not possible. Any communication with sentient beings beyond the solar system can only take place through electromagnetic signal transmission and reception, so the SETI searches remain our best bet for contact.
(from the Peter Huston rebuttal)
Gainers article is the sort that led to my burn out from skepticism. It contains questionable assumptions at several points and then over-reaches from the logical conclusions to make the point the author wishes. For example: When UFOs are reported they should be evaluated with the attitude that alien spacecraft cannot exist. This may be the authors belief, but, based on what I saw, it is a faith-based belief, not grounded in proven fact. And, as skeptics, isnt it simply enough to say When UFOs are reported they should be evaluated with the attitude that none have ever been proven to be alien spacecraft? We are supposed to be the people who read, question and thinknot the ones who blindly repeat assertions that fit our pre-conceived notions.
Interesting reads.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
89 replies, 15708 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
89 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Really? You believe aliens visit earth often? My proof they are not is that.....
Logical
Jan 2013
#2
Then what would stop be from believing in everything? Ghosts? ESP? All religions. Etc? n-t
Logical
Jan 2013
#17
Please provide your BEST case evidence for a UFO. One incident that convinced you they are aliens!
Logical
Jan 2013
#21
Cool I will read about it. Believe me, I would 100% welcome UFO proof. I have wanted it since I...
Logical
Jan 2013
#27
why don't you think the Rendlesham forest incident is a good example anymore?
NoMoreWarNow
Jan 2013
#16
I doubt that's all they do... and how the heck can you comprehend what an alien would do anyway?
NoMoreWarNow
Jan 2013
#50
btw, this reminds me very much of a book I read on debunking alien abductions
NoMoreWarNow
Jan 2013
#25
The author acknowledges the 'huge hole' right off the bat, so it's not really
AtheistCrusader
Feb 2013
#80
I don't have the link now, but I have read speculation they could be a billion years or so more
RKP5637
Jan 2013
#57
The thing is, we assume we are a remote post, because we don't know how they do it
Amonester
Feb 2013
#65
It would happen if this 'agressive' species of ours would learn something from History...
Amonester
Feb 2013
#69
I've often told people, and I've been very serious, only intergalactic intervention
RKP5637
Feb 2013
#70
Probably right! In the big scheme of things, why worry about a spinning ball of dirt with
RKP5637
Feb 2013
#72
if we assume the govt is covering up evidence of aliens in the name of national security
NoMoreWarNow
Feb 2013
#77