Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

usonian

(13,863 posts)

6. It was and is too vague.

Reply to Stuart G (Original post)

Wed Jul 5, 2023, 05:47 PM

Jul 2023

Broad interpretation contradicts the preamble of the Constitution. "To ensure domestic tranquility"

It needed to be clarified and updated over time, esp for WMD's. (To be banned, as they once were. Ahem)

But money buys people. Not just guns. Utter corruption, especially on this court, makes a travesty of the Constitution.

Do ya remember (reading about) prohibition?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If the founding fathers would have known what the 2nd Amendment was going to do to our future, [View all] Stuart G Jul 2023 OP

I think they would have been a lot clearer and detailed about it. BlueTsunami2018 Jul 2023 #1

So do I..I agree with your opinion...maybe "restrictions on owning guns." Stuart G Jul 2023 #3

They would've added the words: yonder Jul 2023 #2

"Well rgulated Militial".was a reason for "police.". There were no "Police Departments" then. Stuart G Jul 2023 #4

Sarcasm, I'll edit. yonder Jul 2023 #8

The Founding Fathers didn't understand the science of statistics and the left side of the mental 303squadron Jul 2023 #5

It was and is too vague. usonian Jul 2023 #6

So much... from guns to drugs... slightlv Jul 2023 #7