Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
6. The difference there is that there has never been any implication
Tue Jan 23, 2018, 11:32 AM
Jan 2018

Last edited Wed Jan 24, 2018, 12:07 AM - Edit history (2)

that the positions anyone on DU takes about the actions of the government of a country where the majority population happened to be black were a reflection of whether posters here want black people to stay alive.

Nobody here would claim, for example, that criticisms of the governments of Haiti or Zimbabwe equates to support for white supremacism or indifference to the physical safety of the black community.

On the other hand, it's commonly implied that people who question what the Israeli government does to Palestinians either don't give a damn about the physical safety of people who are Jewish or secretly wish those people harm.

Everyone on DU is against antisemitism and against the agenda of the alt-right.

(on edit)i've changed the word to "inappropriate", rather than "demagogic".

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Ahed Tamimi: The Mandela ...»Reply #6