Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hillary Clinton
In reply to the discussion: AP calls SD for HRC in major upset!! (Edit) [View all]Her Sister
(6,444 posts)26. NATE SILVER 9:47 PM What Is It About Clinton And South Dakota?
NATE SILVER 9:47 PM
What Is It About Clinton And South Dakota?
A Clinton win in South Dakota, where shes leading by 6 percentage points so far, wouldnt count as that big a shock. She narrowly led the only poll there. And she won South Dakota in 2008, even though Barack Obama won all the surrounding states.
But a win there would break the demographic patterns were used to seeing, since South Dakota is a predominantly white state that allows independents to vote in its primaries similar to the states that have gone for Sanders.
Our demographic model had Sanders favored in South Dakota although, note, it had Obama favored in South Dakota in 2008, so maybe theres something about the demographics there that are hard to pick up.
One factor could be the Native American population, which is about 9 percent of the states population. But that doesnt seem like a likely reason. Sanders is running well in counties that overlap with Native American reservations. And Sanders won Oklahoma, which also has a large Native American vote.
But a win there would break the demographic patterns were used to seeing, since South Dakota is a predominantly white state that allows independents to vote in its primaries similar to the states that have gone for Sanders.
Our demographic model had Sanders favored in South Dakota although, note, it had Obama favored in South Dakota in 2008, so maybe theres something about the demographics there that are hard to pick up.
One factor could be the Native American population, which is about 9 percent of the states population. But that doesnt seem like a likely reason. Sanders is running well in counties that overlap with Native American reservations. And Sanders won Oklahoma, which also has a large Native American vote.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/live-blog/june-7-new-jersey-california-primary-presidential-election-2016/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
71 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)