Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Barack Obama
In reply to the discussion: It was true then, It is true today. [View all]sheshe2
(87,627 posts)43. kairos, there is this too.
There is so much more to the article than health care. Yes that is a huge issue, one that I feel he has done his best to address with so many against him. He is not a King, he is a elected president.
The thrust of my OP was praise for what he HAS been able to accomplise, with the ubstruction of the GOP and yes, I am sorry to say from many democrats.
Then there was this:
From my Link.
Its one thing to point out (accurately) that President Obamas stimulus plan was mostly a compilation of antique Democratic wish lists, and quite another to argue that the correct response to the worst collapse since the thirties is to wait for the economy to get better on its own. Its one thing to worry (wisely) about the long-term trend in government spending, and another to demand big, immediate cuts when 25 million are out of full-time work and the government can borrow for ten years at 2 percent. Its a duty to scrutinize the actions and decisions of the incumbent administration, but an abuse to use the filibuster as a routine tool of legislation or to prevent dozens of presidential appointments from even coming to a vote. Its fine to be unconcerned that the rich are getting richer, but blind to deny that middle-class wages have stagnated or worse over the past dozen years. In the aftershock of 2008, large numbers of Americans feel exploited and abused. Rather than workable solutions, my party is offering low taxes for the currently rich and high spending for the currently old, to be followed by who-knows-what and who-the-hell-cares. This isnt conservatism; its a going-out-of-business sale for the baby-boom generation.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
He's not the only one not swayed by the hatred. We're still fortunate to have PBO.
freshwest
Mar 2013
#1
Somehow I'd rec'd that but not really read it through in this context. Thanks, sheshe.
freshwest
Mar 2013
#9
That statement wasn't quite correct. But it's close to making ins. coverage universally available.
Honeycombe8
Mar 2013
#6
Except for, oh I don't know, Medicare or the coverage afforded members of Congress or Armed Services
DRoseDARs
Mar 2013
#10
No, ins. coverage hasn't always been universally available to most of the people.
Honeycombe8
Mar 2013
#13
This is not a post about a national care system. This is a post about health care coverage.
Honeycombe8
Mar 2013
#46
Insurance companies turn down claims for things that are supposed to be covered all the time
eridani
Mar 2013
#54
Private insurance is the cause of people dying because they can't pay for health care
eridani
Mar 2013
#61
For the umpteenth time, this isn't a thread about a system our country doesn't have. It's about
Honeycombe8
Mar 2013
#55
Evidentally you didn't read my post close enough. "...available to anyone that can afford it."
DRoseDARs
Mar 2013
#19
I'm in the same boat as you Honeycombe. I've got a few years to go until I can qualify for Medicare
xtraxritical
Mar 2013
#41
I feel for you. I have coverage now thru employer, but I was unemployed a short time
Honeycombe8
Mar 2013
#48
Andrew Sullivan is a conservagay. While he isn't as completely nutzoid as his contemporaries...
DRoseDARs
Mar 2013
#8
I've no idea which ones have or haven't. But traditional Medicaid, as in my OP here, covers more.
freshwest
Mar 2013
#23
It was, or about the same. The fight is within the states, where it always was.
freshwest
Mar 2013
#33
Andrew Sullivan is a conservative. He never misses a chance to refer dismissively to "lefies" as if
MotherPetrie
Mar 2013
#51