Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sheshe2

(87,221 posts)
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 08:05 PM Mar 2013

It was true then, It is true today.

Why Obama Still Matters
Andrew Sullivan NOV 21 2011


The one thing I noticed in my continental run-around this past week is just how mad liberals are at Obama. I remain as baffled by this anger as I am by Republican contempt for the guy.New York magazine has two superb essays that sum up my own feelings on both sides pretty perfectly – by Jon Chait and David Frum. Chait notes how systemic and eternal liberal disenchantment is, and how congenitally useless Democrats are in rallying round a leader, even one who has achieved so much in such a short time. Many Dems even now think Clinton was more successful in fighting the GOP in his first term than Obama has been. (Memo to the left: universal healthcare was achieved under Obama). But much of this is the usual Democratic limpness and whininess. If George Bush had taken out Osama bin Laden, wiped out al Qaeda's leadership and gathered a treasure trove of real intelligence by a daring raid, he'd be on Mount Rushmore by now. If he'd done the equivalent on the right of universal healthcare, he'd be the second coming of Reagan. But Obama and liberals? If I hear one more gripe about single payer from someone in their fifties with a ponytail, I'll scream.

But the right is more unhinged and more dangerously full of denial. Since I was never structurally or financially or socially linked to the Washington right, I was immune to the withdrawal of jobs, money and access doled out to any dissenter in the Bush years. But every now and again, I get some kind of amazed look – "You're not going to back Obama again, are you?" – from someone in the conservative cocoon, and when I respond, "So far, you bet!", there is often a long pause and a genuine sadness on their faces. "What the hell happened to him?" you can hear them asking themselves.

Some of this is as head-scratching for me as it is for David:

Some of the smartest and most sophisticated people I know—canny investors, erudite authors—sincerely and passionately believe that President Barack Obama has gone far beyond conventional American liberalism and is willfully and relentlessly driving the United States down the road to socialism. No counterevidence will dissuade them from this belief: not record-high corporate profits, not almost 500,000 job losses in the public sector, not the lowest tax rates since the Truman administration. It is not easy to fit this belief alongside the equally strongly held belief that the president is a pitiful, bumbling amateur, dazed and overwhelmed by a job too big for him—and yet that is done too.

Did you get the impression from the GOP debates that Obama had lowered taxes? That he had not nationalized but saved the banks? That he had dispatched Osama and Qaddafi? That he had 60 percent support for a sane and succcessful foreign policy? That he was an exemplar of all those social values conservatives say they support: a model husband and father, a black man who has eschewed identity politics almost entirely, a president whose speeches are among the most intellectually Christian of any in modern times? This strange, bizarre hostility to him I put down to displaced anger at Bush, to cultural panic among the old, but also to a wider propaganda support system that is truly a sight to behold:

SNIP:

It was never my party, but it was one to which I could once accord regular agreement and respect. No more. I remain unrepentant in my support for this president, a man who has accomplished more in the face of a more hostile environment in his first three years than any president since Johnson. I wish more reasonable Dems and a few moderate Republicans will soon have the courage to say so.


The rest here:
http://dish.andrewsullivan.com/2011/11/21/why-obama-still-matters/
64 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It was true then, It is true today. (Original Post) sheshe2 Mar 2013 OP
He's not the only one not swayed by the hatred. We're still fortunate to have PBO. freshwest Mar 2013 #1
We are so very fortunate to have this President. sheshe2 Mar 2013 #7
Somehow I'd rec'd that but not really read it through in this context. Thanks, sheshe. freshwest Mar 2013 #9
You, freshwest are most welcome! n/t sheshe2 Mar 2013 #12
"Universal healthcare was achieved under Obama"? freedom fighter jh Mar 2013 #2
That statement wasn't quite correct. But it's close to making ins. coverage universally available. Honeycombe8 Mar 2013 #6
Except for, oh I don't know, Medicare or the coverage afforded members of Congress or Armed Services DRoseDARs Mar 2013 #10
No, ins. coverage hasn't always been universally available to most of the people. Honeycombe8 Mar 2013 #13
"Coverage" is not care eridani Mar 2013 #16
This is not a post about a national care system. This is a post about health care coverage. Honeycombe8 Mar 2013 #46
It pays for it treestar Mar 2013 #49
No, insurance doesn't pay for health care--not if they turn down your claim eridani Mar 2013 #52
If they turn down a claim due to treestar Mar 2013 #53
Insurance companies turn down claims for things that are supposed to be covered all the time eridani Mar 2013 #54
Our country doesn't have a single payer system, so that's irrelevant. Honeycombe8 Mar 2013 #56
Private insurance does not exist for the purpose of minimizing claims treestar Mar 2013 #57
It's a way of paying whose purpose is to provide health care for ALL eridani Mar 2013 #59
Murderers. Now you're getting out of hand. treestar Mar 2013 #60
Private insurance is the cause of people dying because they can't pay for health care eridani Mar 2013 #61
For the umpteenth time, this isn't a thread about a system our country doesn't have. It's about Honeycombe8 Mar 2013 #55
Evidentally you didn't read my post close enough. "...available to anyone that can afford it." DRoseDARs Mar 2013 #19
No one can be denied emergency care...this is true. It's the law. Honeycombe8 Mar 2013 #47
I'm in the same boat as you Honeycombe. I've got a few years to go until I can qualify for Medicare xtraxritical Mar 2013 #41
I feel for you. I have coverage now thru employer, but I was unemployed a short time Honeycombe8 Mar 2013 #48
Happy Easter HC. I've seen that web site, thanks you. xtraxritical Mar 2013 #50
Andrew Sullivan is a conservagay. While he isn't as completely nutzoid as his contemporaries... DRoseDARs Mar 2013 #8
I will be happy to provide you with some links... sheshe2 Mar 2013 #14
This is (now) a thread on the Greatest Page. freedom fighter jh Mar 2013 #20
It does not matter that this OP sheshe2 Mar 2013 #22
Oh, I see, I could get barred from posting within the group. freedom fighter jh Mar 2013 #24
right d_b Mar 2013 #18
President Obama still remains Strong in the face Cha Mar 2013 #3
From your post, Cha sheshe2 Mar 2013 #26
No worries, she.. I see you Cha Mar 2013 #38
If a person just hangs around DU all the time, Jamaal510 Mar 2013 #30
Exactly Jamaal.. Cha Mar 2013 #40
APPLAUSE APPLAUSE APPLAUSE. Honeycombe8 Mar 2013 #4
Thank you Honeycombe8! sheshe2 Mar 2013 #15
Universal health care achieved kairos12 Mar 2013 #5
I think that you should be talking to your Governor...and the rest of the GOP sheshe2 Mar 2013 #11
OK thanks for the information kairos12 Mar 2013 #37
kairos, there is this too. sheshe2 Mar 2013 #43
And your problems are Obama's fault, how? freshwest Mar 2013 #17
Thanks for the chart, freshwest! Cha Mar 2013 #21
I've no idea which ones have or haven't. But traditional Medicaid, as in my OP here, covers more. freshwest Mar 2013 #23
Is that the result of last fall's election? freedom fighter jh Mar 2013 #25
It was, or about the same. The fight is within the states, where it always was. freshwest Mar 2013 #33
~~~ sheshe2 Mar 2013 #29
+1 and Thank you! sheshe2 Mar 2013 #27
What a wonderful colorful map kairos12 Mar 2013 #34
WHAT UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE? Demeter Mar 2013 #28
Please read post #22 sheshe2 Mar 2013 #32
OK, this is pathetic. salib Mar 2013 #31
Please read post #22 sheshe2 Mar 2013 #35
sullivan writes a good article that I agree with. riverbendviewgal Mar 2013 #36
Welcome to the BOG, riverbend. sheshe2 Mar 2013 #39
Hi riverbendviewgal.. you have our US media's number! Cha Mar 2013 #42
Cha sheshe2 Mar 2013 #44
Look at you with your Cha Mar 2013 #45
I have looked at The Obama Diary quite a few times riverbendviewgal Mar 2013 #62
Andrew Sullivan is a conservative. He never misses a chance to refer dismissively to "lefies" as if MotherPetrie Mar 2013 #51
Memo to the OP: bvar22 Mar 2013 #58
That's a fair point, but on the other hand, ucrdem Apr 2013 #63
Gee I didn't know Sully felt this way. ucrdem Apr 2013 #64

sheshe2

(87,221 posts)
7. We are so very fortunate to have this President.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 09:28 PM
Mar 2013

With all the negativity, I wanted to post a rebuttal if you will.

I, we all grow tired of the whining. I said it here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/11028191

Thanks, freshwest.

freedom fighter jh

(1,782 posts)
2. "Universal healthcare was achieved under Obama"?
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 08:56 PM
Mar 2013

I guess I missed something. So did friends of mine who can't afford health insurance.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
6. That statement wasn't quite correct. But it's close to making ins. coverage universally available.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 09:27 PM
Mar 2013

Closer than anything the country has ever had.

 

DRoseDARs

(6,810 posts)
10. Except for, oh I don't know, Medicare or the coverage afforded members of Congress or Armed Services
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 09:36 PM
Mar 2013

I know what you're trying to say, I'm just making it a little more accurate. I think we should both agree Sullivan is lying here. "Universal healthcare" has ALWAYS been available if one goes by the tone deaf definition Sullivan is trying to use... available to anyone that can afford it. "Universal healthcare" actually means no one is denied needed care. Period. Elective treatment, as determined by a doctor and not a bean-counter, costs out-of-pocket and is out of the scope of universal healthcare.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
13. No, ins. coverage hasn't always been universally available to most of the people.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 09:43 PM
Mar 2013

If I had been fired at one time, I would not have had a way to get ins. coverage....not poor enough for Medicaid, old enough for Medicare, rich enough to buy it.

He's talking about the subsidies for the working poor and lower middle class, Medicaid for the poor (which has been expanded to include the working poor), Medicare for the seniors, health care for children. The wealthy and most middle class working people get ins. through their employers. Plus the laws that prohibit ins. cos. dropping those who file claims, and prohibit ins. cos. from excluding pre-existing conditions, and prohibit the charging of rates so high that it is equal to not providing coverage at all.

Some still fall through the cracks, which Obama acknowledged on the passing of the ACA. But it's close.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
16. "Coverage" is not care
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 09:52 PM
Mar 2013

Any of the people who are part of the 50% of medical bankruptcies in MA years after Romneycare could explain that to you.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
46. This is not a post about a national care system. This is a post about health care coverage.
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 08:38 AM
Mar 2013

So when talking about health care coverage, yes, the ACA was historical in providing almost universal ACCESS to health care (thru ins. coverage for some, providing direct care for others).

treestar

(82,383 posts)
49. It pays for it
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 10:23 AM
Mar 2013

That meme is just really dumb, sorry. The idea is getting it paid for. Single payer would not be care either, just a means of paying for it. The left needs to stop making itself look stupid by using this canard.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
52. No, insurance doesn't pay for health care--not if they turn down your claim
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 03:59 PM
Mar 2013

In single payer (and single buyer countries as well), claims refusal is illegal. No other country has deductibles either, though some have copayes.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
53. If they turn down a claim due to
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 04:07 PM
Mar 2013

It not being covered, then it needs to be covered. Obamacare helps with that. It's not so that insurance has no value - it does pay out on claims for what it covers.

Single payer would still only pay. It might be a different and better system but is still not care but just a payment method.

The idea of insurance companies turning down most claims doesn't go along with people 's experience. It pays for a lot of things for a lot of people.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
54. Insurance companies turn down claims for things that are supposed to be covered all the time
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 04:20 PM
Mar 2013

Single payer is a payment system designed to maximize benefits. Private insurance exists for the purpose of minimizing them. They are always looking for excuses not to pay.

In MA, 50% of all bankruptcies are STILL due to health care costs. There is no such thing as health care bankruptcy in civilized countries. Before Romneycare, 59% of bankruptcies were health care bankruptcies, so we can expect similar improvement from ACA. However, the 50% number is still NOT acceptable.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
56. Our country doesn't have a single payer system, so that's irrelevant.
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 05:07 PM
Mar 2013

This discussion is about what the ACA accomplished in our insurance-driven system.

Is it perfect? Absolutely not. No legislative bill is perfect. But it is helping millions of people who didn't have access to health care before.

If you don't care about your co-citizens getting health care, I wonder why you're so concerned about a health care system at all. If all that matters to you is if you have health care, and you have it, then you should be happy.

As for bankruptcies, in the U.S. a debtor cannot get care provider bills done away with in bankrtupcy. That law was passed not too long ago. Joe Biden voted for it or actually introduced the bill, as I recall. A very disturbing chapter in Biden's history (altho I otherwise love the guy). Very unfair and harmful to millions of people, who will be saddled with debt the rest of their lives due to one illness....until the ACA passed. The ACA requires NO LIFETIME CAP on coverage. It also does not allow rejection based on a pre-existing condition. It also doesn't allow dropping an insured because he files a claim. It also provides subsidies for policies, if you meet the criteria. It also expands Medicaid into the working poor class.

When you have a policy, now...you know how much out of pocket you will have for an entire year, up front. There should not be many surprises, like before. And the policy won't drop you...so you'll have that same policy the next year.

If you live in a state with exchanges, you will have a FEDERAL policy in your choices, is what I've read. But you will have an array of policies to choose from. I'm not in a state that will have exchanges, but I get my ins. through my employer, like most middle class people.

I hope I can hang in there until I qualify for Medicare at age 65.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
57. Private insurance does not exist for the purpose of minimizing claims
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 08:11 PM
Mar 2013

I sympathize, I have a high deductible. Now 50 and had to pay for a lot of tests out of pocket, because I'm not at the deductible. All those tests you just have to have for being female and/or of a certain age, so we're not even talking about symptoms. But if I were really sick I'd have a way to pay for 80% of the amount over the deductible.

Single payer might cut back on things too, or not cover certain things. It's just a way to pay for it.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
59. It's a way of paying whose purpose is to provide health care for ALL
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 08:32 PM
Mar 2013

Private insurers are essentially mass murderers. If some foreign country killed 44,000 Americans a year, it would be a radioactive parking lot. ACA will improve things, but people will still die because they can't pay for care.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
60. Murderers. Now you're getting out of hand.
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 08:37 PM
Mar 2013

Single payer won't pay for everything everyone wants either. We're just talking about how to pay for it. It is never going to be free.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
61. Private insurance is the cause of people dying because they can't pay for health care
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 08:42 PM
Mar 2013

Health care can be free at the point of service without being free, jsut like the fire department. Single payer will not include every single bells and whistles item, but it will include all standard procedures that save lives, for everybody.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
55. For the umpteenth time, this isn't a thread about a system our country doesn't have. It's about
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 04:57 PM
Mar 2013

access to health care...in our country, that access is obtained by a combination of direct care in some instances, and insurance coverage in other instances.

The govt also doesn't give each of us a million dollars in a basket to provide for our future health care, a new car on our 30th birthday, or all sorts of wishes we might have.

But this is a thread about what is. Not what we dream about (not that dreaming should be stopped, or activism to work towards a national health care system should be dropped). But the ACA accomplished in the US what had never been done before: almost universal access to health care.

If you aren't one of the ones it has helped, you might not think it's important. But there have been members of my family who were denied health care coverage, which would not be the case now because of the ACA. So I personally feel the good that the ACA is accomplishing.

 

DRoseDARs

(6,810 posts)
19. Evidentally you didn't read my post close enough. "...available to anyone that can afford it."
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 09:57 PM
Mar 2013

Pretty much the point of adopting UHC: No one can be denied needed care. That isn't what the ACA does. We both agree that Sullivan is full of crap and that ACA is most certainly not UHC. The ACA is a step in the right direction, but let's not call it what it isn't.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
47. No one can be denied emergency care...this is true. It's the law.
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 08:41 AM
Mar 2013

As far as ordinary care, the ACA, for the first time in American's history, provides almost universal access to health care through direct health care or subsidies to ins. coverage.

Of course, it has long been the case that anyone requiring life saving care gets it...the law requires hospitals to provide that, and the govt reimburses the hospital. This need will go down, now that most people will have access to health care, preventing some emergency situations, and paying for other emergency situations, so the taxpayer doesn't have to pay.

 

xtraxritical

(3,576 posts)
41. I'm in the same boat as you Honeycombe. I've got a few years to go until I can qualify for Medicare
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 11:28 PM
Mar 2013

I have no coverage and can afford none. At my age they won't take me anyhow. America is an effing joke.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
48. I feel for you. I have coverage now thru employer, but I was unemployed a short time
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 08:46 AM
Mar 2013

last year. I paid for the COBRA, but it was hard...it was VERY expensive.

What was helpful was accessing www.healthcare.gov, and using that service to identify policies in my state that I could more easily afford. I could sort them by deductible amount or premium or whatever. There were policies at various premium levels. So I would've gotten a policy that way...a much cheaper policy, just protecting me from a catastrophic illness, probably.

I work mainly for insurance. I work for $, too, don't get me wrong.

The ACA isn't perfect, and passing a national health care system, jumping directly from an insurance provider system, wasn't going to happen. But it has provided access to health care for millions, who didn't have access before, so I acknowledge that. My mother (now deceased) was one of those once denied ins. coverage because of a pre-existing condition. That would no longer be the case.

 

DRoseDARs

(6,810 posts)
8. Andrew Sullivan is a conservagay. While he isn't as completely nutzoid as his contemporaries...
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 09:30 PM
Mar 2013

...he's not above being disingenuous when it suits him.

sheshe2

(87,221 posts)
14. I will be happy to provide you with some links...
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 09:47 PM
Mar 2013

ProSense has an amazing amount of info on these subjects...

May I caution you that you are posting in The Barack Obama Group.

You can always start a thread in GD.

freedom fighter jh

(1,782 posts)
20. This is (now) a thread on the Greatest Page.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 09:58 PM
Mar 2013

Are there things that are not allowed to be said on a thread that originated in the Barack Obama Group?

What would be at those links? Evidence that Obama did in fact bring us universal healthcare?

sheshe2

(87,221 posts)
22. It does not matter that this OP
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 10:07 PM
Mar 2013

is in GD:

Mission Statement Barack Obama Group:
This is a group, not a forum. Groups often serve as safe havens for members who share similar interests and viewpoints. Individuals who post messages contrary to a particular group's stated purpose can be excluded from posting in that group. For detailed information about this group and its purpose,

roup Hosts are assigned either by the DU Administrators, or by other Hosts of that group. Group Hosts have the following abilities: 1) They can lock threads which they believe violate the group's stated purpose; 2) they can pin threads to the top of the group; 3) they may completely block out members whom they believe are not adhering to the group's purpose; 4) they may add other members as group Hosts; and 5) they may remove any Host that became a Host after they did (and who is listed below their name on the list below).


Your bio shows that you have been here since 2006....I think you should know about the groups and their mission statements!

freedom fighter jh

(1,782 posts)
24. Oh, I see, I could get barred from posting within the group.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 10:18 PM
Mar 2013

That's OK.

I don't pay much attention to group rules, because until this moment I have not knowingly posted in a group. Sorry I missed that.

Cha

(305,022 posts)
3. President Obama still remains Strong in the face
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 09:14 PM
Mar 2013

of Hostility from both ends of the Spectrum.

In Miami, President Obama Talks About his Plan to Put People to Work Rebuilding America

President Obama was in Florida today, where he got a chance to see the Port Miami tunnel project on Dodge Island. The project, which is the result of three years of work by over 500 employees and more than 6,000 sub-contractors and vendors, will create connect the port to the interstate highway system more quickly and safely and will take over 1.5 million trucks out of the downtown area per year.

It is projects like this one, the President said in remarks following his tour, that will help reignite the true engine of our economic growth -- a rising, thriving middle class. "Projects like this create a lot of other good jobs, too," President Obama explained. "You ask any CEO where we they rather locate their business and hire new workers. Are you going to set up shop in a country that's got raggedy roads, runways that are pot-holed, and backed-up supply chains? Or are you going to seek out high-speed rail, Internet, high-tech schools, new state-of-the-art power grids, new bridges, new tunnels, new ports that help you ship products made in America to the rest of the world as fast as possible? That's what people are looking for. That's what CEOs are looking for."





http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2013/03/29/miami-president-obama-talks-about-his-plan-put-people-work-rebuilding-america

thank you for aritcle from Andrew Sullivan, she.. and as you say.. was true then and it's true now.

BOG

sheshe2

(87,221 posts)
26. From your post, Cha
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 10:25 PM
Mar 2013

"Hostility from both ends of the Spectrum."

Oh yeah, so very well said!

Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner, a little busy...

Thanks for the news from Miami!

Cha

(305,022 posts)
38. No worries, she.. I see you
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 11:18 PM
Mar 2013

have your hands full.

Not sure what he meant by that? "Universal Healthcare".. If he was talking about just the medicaid part or what? But, the fact remains that the President matters as much now as then. Andrew was right about this..

I remain unrepentant in my support for this president, a man who has accomplished more in the face of a more hostile environment in his first three years than any president since Johnson. I wish more reasonable Dems and a few moderate Republicans will soon have the courage to say so.

Jamaal510

(10,893 posts)
30. If a person just hangs around DU all the time,
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 10:29 PM
Mar 2013

"President Obama still remains Strong in the face of Hostility from both ends of the Spectrum."

it would be hard to believe that his approval rating is even in the mid 50s. His critics are about as vocal on the Left as they are on the Right. Even when he does something beneficial or takes a populist position (such as his Jobs Act he tried to pass, ending the war, or endorsing gay marriage), they just look past that and look for something to jump on him for in order to brand him as some DINO sellout.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
4. APPLAUSE APPLAUSE APPLAUSE.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 09:25 PM
Mar 2013

No wonder he's a writer by profession. He says things so well.

I have gotten disappointed, angry, frustrated. But in the end, after I regroup, I start thinking about the whole picture and remember all that he's done, under the most trying circumstances. Passing the ACA was nothing short of miraculous, despite its shortcomings. Setting aside millions of acres to be preserved. The Lilly Ledbetter Act. And on and on. I support him.

kairos12

(13,240 posts)
5. Universal health care achieved
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 09:25 PM
Mar 2013

That is a laughable, preposterous statement. Tell that to all the people in my Red State who:

don't have the money for pre-existing condition pools

no private insurance will touch

Red State Teabag governor cut funds for people in her condition

won't live long enough to qualify for SSDI or Medicare

over 26 and off their parents health care

He is as full of shit on this issue as when he supported Shrub's war in Iraq.

sheshe2

(87,221 posts)
11. I think that you should be talking to your Governor...and the rest of the GOP
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 09:36 PM
Mar 2013

Governor's have the option of opting out of care that is provided under ACA. This at a huge cost to the states. Please place blame where it it due. This is not the fault of the President.

And a word of caution here. You are posting on The Barack Obama Group.

sheshe2

(87,221 posts)
43. kairos, there is this too.
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 12:16 AM
Mar 2013

There is so much more to the article than health care. Yes that is a huge issue, one that I feel he has done his best to address with so many against him. He is not a King, he is a elected president.

The thrust of my OP was praise for what he HAS been able to accomplise, with the ubstruction of the GOP and yes, I am sorry to say from many democrats.

Then there was this:
From my Link.

It’s one thing to point out (accurately) that President Obama’s stimulus plan was mostly a compilation of antique Democratic wish lists, and quite another to argue that the correct response to the worst collapse since the thirties is to wait for the economy to get better on its own. It’s one thing to worry (wisely) about the long-term trend in government spending, and another to demand big, immediate cuts when 25 million are out of full-time work and the government can borrow for ten years at 2 percent. It’s a duty to scrutinize the actions and decisions of the incumbent administration, but an abuse to use the filibuster as a routine tool of legislation or to prevent dozens of presidential appointments from even coming to a vote. It’s fine to be unconcerned that the rich are getting richer, but blind to deny that ­middle-class wages have stagnated or worse over the past dozen years. In the aftershock of 2008, large numbers of Americans feel exploited and abused. Rather than workable solutions, my party is offering low taxes for the currently rich and high spending for the currently old, to be followed by who-knows-what and who-the-hell-cares. This isn’t conservatism; it’s a going-out-of-business sale for the baby-boom generation.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
17. And your problems are Obama's fault, how?
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 09:53 PM
Mar 2013


Have you used your energy to convince your neighbors to vote the Tea Party out of power to get what you need?

Coming here using abusive language and sneering isn't going to solve your problem:

...In short, if you’re still disappointed in Barack Obama, it’s only because you never understood whose job it was to produce change in the first place. But don’t take out your own failings in this regard on the rest of us...

~Tim Wise

Cha

(305,022 posts)
21. Thanks for the chart, freshwest!
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 10:02 PM
Mar 2013

I thought I remebered Rick Scott wanting to accept Obamacare but I guess not.

But, Jan Brewer did.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
23. I've no idea which ones have or haven't. But traditional Medicaid, as in my OP here, covers more.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 10:18 PM
Mar 2013

Obama is not a dictator who can make every state obey him. Not sure why people expect him to be. Maybe they miss good ol' Shrub's 'ballsy' style. There is good news, though:



freedom fighter jh

(1,782 posts)
25. Is that the result of last fall's election?
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 10:20 PM
Mar 2013

It would be shrinking even more if gerrymandering weren't keeping it bloated.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
33. It was, or about the same. The fight is within the states, where it always was.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 10:37 PM
Mar 2013

If Battleground Texas keeps on pushing forward, it will be blue in a few years. Many of the states aren't really red to begin with. They are purple and the traditional winner take all system disenfranchises many. All of these things are managed on the local level, not by PBO. I've learned recently districts can be changed and partisan gerrymandering challenged non-stop. It requires not ceding any election no matter how trivial they may seem to the GOP who is always working on the ground game. Many people only watch the elections every four years, but it's really what happens in the years between that determine the outcome. It's not an episode of American Idol and then it's done, it's ongoing.

kairos12

(13,240 posts)
34. What a wonderful colorful map
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 10:37 PM
Mar 2013

The term Sullivan uses is universal health care. For the good Obama achieved it was not universal health care as Sullivan claims. Millions will not be covered. That is not universal health care so Sullivan should not use that term.

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
28. WHAT UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE?
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 10:26 PM
Mar 2013

there's no such thing, and anyone who tells you there is is selling something.

salib

(2,116 posts)
31. OK, this is pathetic.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 10:31 PM
Mar 2013

Talk about
- cherry picking
- misdirection
- demonizing
- straw men

Etc.

We, as thing individuals, let alone liberals, can do better than this silliness.

riverbendviewgal

(4,317 posts)
36. sullivan writes a good article that I agree with.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 11:08 PM
Mar 2013

As your neighbor up north, I and my fellow Canadians wish we had an Obama. America's problem and Obama's is the tea bagging republicans. I have been lurking on DU for years and lately I find my self disgusted with many DUrs with their hatred of Obama.

As a president he can only do so much. All those filibusters are absurd. Your media is corrupt when it does not present the facts and makes stupid stories big news.

My history teacher said empires last about 200 to 250 years. Empires die from within due to apathy, ignorance and corruption. America is on it's way down.

I admired America for electing Obama but now I see his own side turning on him. So now It is time for me to get very involved in making sure my country goes to the NDP or Liberals. Harper is a danger. Canadians made a grave mistake in the last election.

My concern now is water, health care , especially mental health care and having more green energy, better education. I want a progressive Canada and the only to get it is to work at it.



sheshe2

(87,221 posts)
39. Welcome to the BOG, riverbend.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 11:18 PM
Mar 2013

I thank you for you post.

You want for Canada what we, well most of us want for the US. We have the hater's. However we have strength too. We can do this, we all can.

sheshe

Cha

(305,022 posts)
42. Hi riverbendviewgal.. you have our US media's number!
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 12:13 AM
Mar 2013

It's treasonous in my view. During the bush error I lived in upstate New York and would get CBC with Peter Mansbridge.

Pres Obama's "side" isn't really turning against him.. these people have always been against him. There are still a lot of people who appreciate this President for what he's accomplished in the face of such venomous hostility.

You should check out http://theobamadiary.com/ for an excellent photo -journalism site of the President and his Administration.. Plus, the supporters on there are chock full of reality based information.

Good Luck with Canada getting more Green Energy and your other concerns of water, health care(mental health care especially), and education!

Aloha, riverbendviewgal~

Cha

(305,022 posts)
45. Look at you with your
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 12:32 AM
Mar 2013

Canadian Flag, sheshe!

Big Maple Leaf.. I love Canada.. got me a grey hoodie there in Niagara Falls one time with a big red Maple Leaf on it.

Yeah, I thought riverbendviewgal might want a look at our The Obama Diary for a good dose of reality.

BOG

riverbendviewgal

(4,317 posts)
62. I have looked at The Obama Diary quite a few times
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 10:51 PM
Mar 2013

It is excellent...

I just get discouraged watching US news...sometimes I think Obama is in quicksand. I believe it is his colour that many Americans hate. including my brother, who lives in NJ. All his family and friends in his circle hate Obama and the democrats. They pride themselves on being ignorant of the world. football is their universe..

 

MotherPetrie

(3,145 posts)
51. Andrew Sullivan is a conservative. He never misses a chance to refer dismissively to "lefies" as if
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 11:21 AM
Mar 2013

it's still 1972.

His wholesale approval for Obama needs to be evaluated in that context. It is NOT untinged by Sullivan's own biases.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
58. Memo to the OP:
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 08:24 PM
Mar 2013

Mandatory Health Insurance from For Profit Vendors
is [font size=3]NOT[/font] "Universal Health CARE".

ucrdem

(15,703 posts)
63. That's a fair point, but on the other hand,
Mon Apr 1, 2013, 02:27 AM
Apr 2013

ACA as I understand it is a vast improvement over what it's replacing, or I suppose we could say regulating, which is/was a largely predatory free-market free-for-all that's dandy for those lucky enough to have good insurance and/or a lot of dough but hell for everybody else. So in the main I'd say Sully's point is accurate.

ucrdem

(15,703 posts)
64. Gee I didn't know Sully felt this way.
Mon Apr 1, 2013, 02:33 AM
Apr 2013

I wonder if he still does. Can't think why he wouldn't except that he was awfully harsh on BO after that first debate. But I guess his job as a pundit is to be fickle now and then. In any case thanks for this great find sheshe!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Barack Obama»It was true then, It is t...