Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Barack Obama
In reply to the discussion: It was true then, It is true today. [View all]freshwest
(53,661 posts)33. It was, or about the same. The fight is within the states, where it always was.
If Battleground Texas keeps on pushing forward, it will be blue in a few years. Many of the states aren't really red to begin with. They are purple and the traditional winner take all system disenfranchises many. All of these things are managed on the local level, not by PBO. I've learned recently districts can be changed and partisan gerrymandering challenged non-stop. It requires not ceding any election no matter how trivial they may seem to the GOP who is always working on the ground game. Many people only watch the elections every four years, but it's really what happens in the years between that determine the outcome. It's not an episode of American Idol and then it's done, it's ongoing.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
He's not the only one not swayed by the hatred. We're still fortunate to have PBO.
freshwest
Mar 2013
#1
Somehow I'd rec'd that but not really read it through in this context. Thanks, sheshe.
freshwest
Mar 2013
#9
That statement wasn't quite correct. But it's close to making ins. coverage universally available.
Honeycombe8
Mar 2013
#6
Except for, oh I don't know, Medicare or the coverage afforded members of Congress or Armed Services
DRoseDARs
Mar 2013
#10
No, ins. coverage hasn't always been universally available to most of the people.
Honeycombe8
Mar 2013
#13
This is not a post about a national care system. This is a post about health care coverage.
Honeycombe8
Mar 2013
#46
Insurance companies turn down claims for things that are supposed to be covered all the time
eridani
Mar 2013
#54
Private insurance is the cause of people dying because they can't pay for health care
eridani
Mar 2013
#61
For the umpteenth time, this isn't a thread about a system our country doesn't have. It's about
Honeycombe8
Mar 2013
#55
Evidentally you didn't read my post close enough. "...available to anyone that can afford it."
DRoseDARs
Mar 2013
#19
I'm in the same boat as you Honeycombe. I've got a few years to go until I can qualify for Medicare
xtraxritical
Mar 2013
#41
I feel for you. I have coverage now thru employer, but I was unemployed a short time
Honeycombe8
Mar 2013
#48
Andrew Sullivan is a conservagay. While he isn't as completely nutzoid as his contemporaries...
DRoseDARs
Mar 2013
#8
I've no idea which ones have or haven't. But traditional Medicaid, as in my OP here, covers more.
freshwest
Mar 2013
#23
It was, or about the same. The fight is within the states, where it always was.
freshwest
Mar 2013
#33
Andrew Sullivan is a conservative. He never misses a chance to refer dismissively to "lefies" as if
MotherPetrie
Mar 2013
#51