Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

luckyleftyme2

(3,880 posts)
1. I THINK THE GOV. SHOULD BE MADE TO PAY DEARLY
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 08:09 PM
Aug 2015

I DON'T SEE HOW THIS ISN'T A CRIMINAL SUIT FOR THE EVIDENCE BODES STRONGLY ON ABUSE OF POWER AND THREATENING TO WITHHOLD TAX PAYERS MONEY FOR PERSONAL REASONS.
I THINK IN A CIVIL SUIT THERE WILL BE NO QUESTION HE WILL RECEIVE DAMAGES EQUAL TO HIS SALARY AND IT SHOULD BE THE SALARY HE WOULD HAVE RECEIVED FOR A MINIMUM OF 5 YEARS.
AND IF THE STATE HAS TO PAY IT THEN THEY CAN RECOUP IT FROM THE RETIREMENT CHECK
THE GOVERNOR SHOULDN'T RECEIVE!
RE READING THIS I THINK THE SOLUTION LOOKS LIKE A REPUBLICAN MIGHT HAVE INFLUENCED ME

!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Maine»Speaker of the House File...»Reply #1