Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: President unveils new 'Trump class' fleet of battleships [View all]reACTIONary
(6,948 posts)27. It is questionable .....
..... whether the vessel itself ever would be built
From the WaPo article about the announcement:
Mark Cancian, a senior adviser in the defense and security program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank. He questioned whether the vessel itself ever would be built, noting that its significant size will saddle the battleship with similar limitations and vulnerabilities as the nations other large warships. The Navy for decades has emphasized a smaller and distributed fleet as a way to counter evolving technologies such as drone warfare.
Theres going to be a lot of ink spilled over this ship but this ship is never going to sail, Cancian predicted. Its going to take four, five, six years to develop a ship this large that is so unlike current designs.
Theres going to be a lot of ink spilled over this ship but this ship is never going to sail, Cancian predicted. Its going to take four, five, six years to develop a ship this large that is so unlike current designs.
Paywall free, but you may need to register your email: https://wapo.st/498cQ7U
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The American shipbuilding industry is on life support and cannot produce these ships . . . or any other ship
AverageOldGuy
14 hrs ago
#5
Thankfully the Fascist Felon will be dead before any of this sees the light of day.
Dulcinea
1 min ago
#53
Gosh. Which hostile foreign power to whom Trump is indebted would benefit from this?
Orrex
12 hrs ago
#18
The Battleship became obsolete on December 7th, 1941, but that fact seems to have escaped
Jack Valentino
11 hrs ago
#30
I'm not sure that's totally true, especially in shore bombardment, but carriers had become much more important by then.
Gore1FL
10 hrs ago
#33
The way the navy does it is the class is named for the christened name of the 1st ship.
JohnnyRingo
9 hrs ago
#39
Doesn't congress have to approve the expenditure? Or is this like the $40 billion Argentina
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
6 hrs ago
#47