Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Kid Berwyn

(18,254 posts)

2. Holy Smokes!!!!

Reply to Uncle Joe (Original post)

Wed Oct 2, 2024, 03:15 PM

Oct 2

From Jack Smith:

...In Trump v. United States, 144 S. Ct. 2312 (2024), the Supreme Court held that presidents are immune from prosecution for certain official conduct— including the defendant’s use of the Justice Department in furtherance of his scheme, as was alleged in the original indictment—and remanded to this Court to determine whether the remaining allegations against the defendant are immunized. The answer to that question is no.

Get yer own copy: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.258148/gov.uscourts.dcd.258148.252.0.pdf

ETA: LOCK HIM UP!!!!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

12 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Uncle Joe Think. Again.txwhitedove canuckledragger Dock_Yard FakeNoose Dem2theMax orleans jtb653 Lemonwurst byronius calimary

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bombshell special counsel filing includes new allegations of Trump's 'increasingly desperate' efforts to overturn electi [View all] Uncle Joe Oct 2 OP

Let's see the little cannon go roscoeroscoe Oct 2 #1

Yeah, the way it used to back in the day!! Leghorn21 Oct 2 #14

Holy Smokes!!!! Kid Berwyn Oct 2 #2

hey kid berwyn -- thank you for that pdf jack smith link! nt orleans Oct 2 #25

Being covered extensively on Nicole Wallace's show radical noodle Oct 2 #3

WoW DemonGoddess Oct 2 #4

44 months and counting republianmushroom Oct 2 #5

VP Harris needs to bring this up during her 60 minutes interview. JohnSJ Oct 2 #6

"With private co-conspirators" hibbing Oct 2 #7

John Eastman, Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, Sidney Powell, several others FakeNoose Oct 2 #8

The usual suspects ArkansasDemocrat1 Oct 2 #20

Jack Smith is the Oprah of RICOs ArkansasDemocrat1 Oct 2 #21

He might as well name them all because they're all goin' down FakeNoose Oct 2 #26

And some of the criminals he pardoned... (nt.) Pluvious Oct 2 #27

Alex Jones, I think was the podcaster mentioned, IMO. slightlv Oct 2 #23

The guy from the online retailer wryter2000 Oct 3 #30

Here is a link to the filing LetMyPeopleVote Oct 2 #9

Thanks for the addition LetMyPeopleVote Uncle Joe Oct 2 #10

🎶Zippidy-do-dah, zippidy-aye 🎶 Hekate Oct 2 #17

Bet the House found all of this out during their investigation as well. Freethinker65 Oct 2 #11

CYA...no honor among thieves and BattleRow Oct 2 #12

Exacatly!! Let's hope this is NOT the end of this bullshit. bluestarone Oct 2 #13

Telling the American people the truth. In Republican speak BOSSHOG Oct 2 #15

TickTock motherf*cker. Joinfortmill Oct 2 #16

Is this really new? onandup Oct 2 #18

I think I might have called them dangerous. Lawyers tend to pussyfoot around this stuff Warpy Oct 2 #19

Cannon is a different case wryter2000 Oct 3 #31

Here is a potential list of the witnesses mentioned in the Jack Smith filing LetMyPeopleVote Oct 2 #22

There's an updated list apparently... Pluvious Oct 2 #28

This message was self-deleted by its author Omaha Steve Oct 2 #24

The thing that shocked me the most creeksneakers2 Oct 3 #29

Here's the updated list of alleged conspirators from the redacted immunity filing by Jack Smith LetMyPeopleVote Oct 3 #32

Judge Chutkan - The claims of TFG's attorneys are "unbefitting of experienced defense counsel" LetMyPeopleVote Oct 3 #33

I believe "unbefitting" sums *rump up better Uncle Joe Oct 3 #34