Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]tpsbmam
(3,927 posts)80. First, I don't appreciate you labeling me a liar when it is far from the truth. It is you who is
woefully uninformed. I won't label you a liar since it appears you simply don't know what's been going on all over the country. If you do, then it is, indeed, you who are lying about what this administration has been doing regarding medical cannabis.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rob-kampia/obama-from-first-to-worst_b_1001781.html?view=print&comm_ref=false
In 2000, Clinton signed into law a bill] that made it harder for the federal government to seize property through civil lawsuits. Unfortunately, the federal government can still wreak havoc when it wants to, and the Bush and Obama administrations have both threatened some landlords (almost exclusively in California) with property forfeiture if they lease their properties to medical marijuana growers or dispensaries.
The IRS started going after medical marijuana businesses under the second Bush regime, and the IRS has continued doing so under Obama. In a fluke of how federal law is written, the IRS is arguing that businesses can actually deduct the cost of the marijuana that they're selling, but businesses cannot deduct other costs (rent, salaries, insurance, supplies) that any other business would normally deduct. If this doesn't change, almost all dispensaries will either go out of business or become tax evaders; either way, the federal government will be deprived of tax revenues.
This past spring, Obama's U.S. attorneys in Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Montana, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington state issued letters to local and state government officials at carefully chosen times, for the purpose of killing medical marijuana reform measures or hampering implementation in each state.
On September 21, Obama's ATF issued an open letter saying that gun shops cannot sell guns to medical marijuana patients -- or people who are known to be addicted to drugs other than alcohol or tobacco, ironically enough.
The IRS started going after medical marijuana businesses under the second Bush regime, and the IRS has continued doing so under Obama. In a fluke of how federal law is written, the IRS is arguing that businesses can actually deduct the cost of the marijuana that they're selling, but businesses cannot deduct other costs (rent, salaries, insurance, supplies) that any other business would normally deduct. If this doesn't change, almost all dispensaries will either go out of business or become tax evaders; either way, the federal government will be deprived of tax revenues.
This past spring, Obama's U.S. attorneys in Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Montana, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington state issued letters to local and state government officials at carefully chosen times, for the purpose of killing medical marijuana reform measures or hampering implementation in each state.
On September 21, Obama's ATF issued an open letter saying that gun shops cannot sell guns to medical marijuana patients -- or people who are known to be addicted to drugs other than alcohol or tobacco, ironically enough.
From a separate story in Raw Story:
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/05/04/exclusive-doj-plan-to-arrest-state-licensers-tax-dispensaries-could-doom-medical-marijuana-industry/
A recent letter from the Department of Justice (DOJ)], threatening state employees in charge of implmenting medical marijuana laws with prosecution, has forced some governors to re-evaluate and even veto popular legislation all seemingly in violation of what the medical marijauana community thought was a cease-fire with the federal government.
Facing the threat of seeing otherwise innocent state employees thrown in jail, lawmakers are responding in an entirely human fashion: what Allen St. Pierre, executive director of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), called the old need to CYA cover your ass.
Ultimately, the administrations confusing legal position has led to a stagnation of medical marijuana reform efforts, with some states simply deciding its not worth the risk.
Facing the threat of seeing otherwise innocent state employees thrown in jail, lawmakers are responding in an entirely human fashion: what Allen St. Pierre, executive director of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), called the old need to CYA cover your ass.
Ultimately, the administrations confusing legal position has led to a stagnation of medical marijuana reform efforts, with some states simply deciding its not worth the risk.
And beyond use, he has cut off medical marijuana research, which is unforgivable IMO!
International studies are fortunately ahead of us. Obama's continued backward treatment of medical marijuana research has all but precluded its study in the United States. Here's one of the many issues:
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/11/26/obama-war-on-weed.aspx
Of course, in the United States marijuana is so heavily controlled that even if you wanted to conduct a clinical trial, you would have a hard time getting a supply for research purposes. As the Safe Access report states:
" the federal monopoly on the supply of cannabis has fundamentally limited FDA-approved clinical research to investigate its safety and efficacy in controlling symptoms of serious and chronic illnesses.
In the United States, research is stalled, and in some cases blocked, by a complicated federal approval process, restricted access to research-grade cannabis, and the refusal of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to license private production of cannabis for use exclusively in federally approved research."
" the federal monopoly on the supply of cannabis has fundamentally limited FDA-approved clinical research to investigate its safety and efficacy in controlling symptoms of serious and chronic illnesses.
In the United States, research is stalled, and in some cases blocked, by a complicated federal approval process, restricted access to research-grade cannabis, and the refusal of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to license private production of cannabis for use exclusively in federally approved research."
Obama's medical marijuana policies are, indeed, backward and impeding both the access to medical marijuana and research. And if you can't acknowledge that, well, that's your issue. I say it's well established FACT!
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
122 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It is decriminalized for those without a medical card (depending on amount).
unapatriciated
Jan 2012
#76
I'll say again, if you want Obama to do liberal things, give him a liberal congress.
Kurmudgeon
Jan 2012
#49
lol... I've hear that speaking 'sense' can get you banned on DU3 so shhhhhh
Joe Shlabotnik
Jan 2012
#16
I think that is is the political ridicule potential of legalisation that scares the politicans
Mopar151
Jan 2012
#110
I'm starting to think these "MMJ activists" are smoking crack along with their cannabis.
tridim
Jan 2012
#27
What it comes down to, ultimately, is mmj patients don't give a shit if Obama supports mmj
RainDog
Jan 2012
#119
MMJ will never get favorable legislation until corporate money is out of campaign finance.
Xtraneous
Jan 2012
#37
There doesn't need to be a great public outcry for the federal government to enforce its laws.
randome
Jan 2012
#109
And I seriously doubt Ron Pauls claims. He knows the congress will not pass anything like that if it
jwirr
Jan 2012
#40
It's hard to take medical cannabis seriously when Democrats are making ill-informed
tpsbmam
Jan 2012
#41
First, I don't appreciate you labeling me a liar when it is far from the truth. It is you who is
tpsbmam
Jan 2012
#80
I didn't label you a liar. I labelled the people lying about Obama's official position liars.
tridim
Jan 2012
#87
So what are they lying about? What about all that I posted -- it's drastically different
tpsbmam
Jan 2012
#96
Medical Marijuana Patients Concerned About Attempt To Legalize In Washington State
DeathToTheOil
Jan 2012
#44