Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(129,874 posts)
7. Here is an out-take from the article:
Thu Dec 18, 2025, 02:27 PM
Thursday
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/17/well/family/sterilization-tubal-ligation-younger-women.html


Female sterilization, medically called tubal ligation or salpingectomy, entails removing, severing or blocking the fallopian tubes. It is a permanent and highly effective form of contraception. For decades, the typical sterilization patient was an older woman who had already had children, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

But emerging data mirrors what Dr. Tatum was seeing at her clinic: After Roe was overturned in 2022, more younger, child-free women opted for the consequential procedure, effectively eliminating their chances of unintended pregnancies. One study, published last April, which looked at medical records from across the country, found that from June 2022 to September 2023, 21,180 18- to 30-year-olds had tubal ligations, up from 11,480 in that age group in the four years before the decision.

And, while more recent data isn’t available, patients and clinicians from seven states, some of which had abortion bans and others of which did not, as well as representatives from Planned Parenthood, told The New York Times that interest in the procedure among that demographic had remained high over the last three years, including after the 2024 election.

Some women told The Times that sterilization was a way to control their bodies and health at a time when their reproductive rights are in jeopardy and abortion is banned or restricted in 19 states.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The right-wingers are going to shit! Aristus Thursday #1
Well there's that but also the fact that they hate when women have autonomy over their bodies AZJonnie Thursday #3
Actually the male right wingers want to keep women at home and making babies. Diamond_Dog Thursday #4
And I can only imagine what the radtrads and fundamentalists will say... keep_left Thursday #19
the right wingers will take that away -- either by law or by buying the hospitals JT45242 Thursday #2
Probably doesn't have to happen in a hospital. MorbidButterflyTat Thursday #22
You are correct I had mine done at a clinic Akacia Thursday #23
Here in Iowa almost all clinics are associated with a hospital group JT45242 Thursday #24
Does anyone have a link without a paywall? This one does not work for me. Thanks in advance. Diamond_Dog Thursday #5
Sorry. I don't know how to do that. The link to the NYTimes applegrove Thursday #6
I have shown posters here the archive site link so so many times before. Here it is again: Celerity Thursday #20
Here is an out-take from the article: applegrove Thursday #7
I think this will work angel823 Thursday #8
Good. Tbh I haven't heard convincing pro-natal arguments to women not wanting babies and why they should have them. Oneironaut Thursday #9
Good. Their body, their choice. And frankly flvegan Thursday #10
Just one of the reasons to not have children in the US is area51 Thursday #11
We are not childLESS, we are childFREE synni Thursday #12
You are bloody well right irisblue Thursday #15
Can't say I blame them under the circumstances MustLoveBeagles Thursday #13
There are entire Discord groups xmas74 Thursday #14
I'm sure that tubal ligation woud be a seriously punishable crime in the Republic of Gilead. flashman13 Thursday #16
The wealthy can get in vitro gulliver Thursday #17
Men Have Options Too 2na fisherman Thursday #18
My thoughts on this subject Diamond_Dog Thursday #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»More young, childless wom...»Reply #7