Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

H2O Man

(78,496 posts)
24. There are some
Wed Dec 17, 2025, 01:07 AM
Wednesday

politicians that I try to listen to very closely. I trust them to be insightful, informed, and honest. One of the very best of these in my long life is Rep. Jamie Raskin. There have been a number of times in recent months where he has said that along with the Epstein scandal files, they need to release Mr. Smith's second report. This raises an interesting question if, among the documents the felon stole back when President Biden sent him packing, were at least some document the felon's connections to Epstein.

Rep. Raskin is highly intelligent, and he is also very capable. He is able to organize and take actions "behind the scenes" and they are making advances beneath the surface as defined by the media. So I share the frustrations that several are speaking about. This meeting may well be disappointing, in the context of media coverage, yet another stumbling block in a path towards progress.

I also have confidence that in a relatively short time, there will be republicans in the House trying to separate from the felon. We need public pressure, using Amendment 1 rights and contacting elected representatives. I anticipate parts of Mr. Smith's second report being made public sometime before November of 2026.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yes, We've noticed.. Cha Tuesday #1
He is frightening and he is evil. sheshe2 Tuesday #3
Jack Smith testifies tomorrow & eps file release deadline is 12/19 SheltieLover Tuesday #2
I didn't know he was testifying tomorrow. sheshe2 Tuesday #4
No cameras allowed. H2O Man Tuesday #5
Thanks. sheshe2 Tuesday #6
Rotten pricks SheltieLover Wednesday #10
So they can get away with lying about what he said, that's their motivation. Smith wanted to speak to Congress Rhiannon12866 Wednesday #15
I've heard that H2O Man Wednesday #17
Exactly. Special Counsel Jack Smith has all the goods on the felon-in-chief so they don't want it publicly released Rhiannon12866 Wednesday #20
There are some H2O Man Wednesday #24
Oh, I sure agree! Jamie Raskin has weathered so much, but he not only keeps going and is a constitutional scholar Rhiannon12866 Wednesday #26
Jamie Raskin kwolf68 Wednesday #29
Yes. sheshe2 Wednesday #19
I'm willing to bet that Jack Smith will find a way to get the truth of his investigation out there Rhiannon12866 Wednesday #21
Smith and the Democrats that will be there, sheshe2 Wednesday #23
Closed door. Because fuck you taxpayers. SheltieLover Wednesday #8
Figures. sheshe2 Wednesday #9
Of course. It's the United States of Extortion. SheltieLover Wednesday #11
Always the way in the United States of Extortion SheltieLover Wednesday #12
I guess that's why he's addressing the nation tomorrow, he wants his war with Venezuela--pronto! C Moon Wednesday #16
Whatever distracts from Jack Smith's closed testimony SheltieLover Wednesday #18
And Wehner is a REAL Republican! NM Grins Tuesday #7
Donald Trump is the personification of evil. dalton99a Wednesday #13
NYT editorial by a republican provides satisfying condemnation. And as usual the comments wiggs Wednesday #14
Well that is spot on, from a Republican no less. sheshe2 Wednesday #22
True that. All of that. Every single word of that. oasis Wednesday #25
The most dangerous time for an mercuryblues Wednesday #27
The orange convict is a reflection of his voters. It's not him alone. Hotler Wednesday #28
Can it finally consume him yet? Blue Owl Wednesday #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump's inferno of hate i...»Reply #24