Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

questionseverything

(10,473 posts)
90. I couldn't find anywhere it said the software was seen
Thu Nov 21, 2024, 04:19 PM
Nov 2024

It said it was voluntary

And that vendors could get their own labs approved?

Of course since republicans broke into coffee county and copied that software and distributed it all over… and Georgia didn’t apply the patch before the election…

So honestly I don’t know what it all means but I know burying my head and trusting oligarchs is not what democracy deserves

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That's terrible, I had no idea they would find inaccuracies this big and ignore it questionseverything Nov 2024 #1
We've been discussing this here on DU for days. Think. Again. Nov 2024 #3
You write... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #2
Thank you... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #4
My question would also be moniss Nov 2024 #8
0.5? vs 0.05%? Would you mind double-checking your post? lostnfound Nov 2024 #12
Thank you, I was mistaken... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #17
What was the vote margin in those 3 races that were reversed? MichMan Nov 2024 #37
The problem as I see it... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #38
Miscounting votes was only one piece of it. Irish_Dem Nov 2024 #42
100% absolute perfection is unobtainable MichMan Nov 2024 #43
Which is why verification is so necessary. Think. Again. Nov 2024 #46
Do you think none of that is done on the state and precinct levels before the votes are certified? MichMan Nov 2024 #48
Yes, I do think more can be done... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #50
Recounts are conducted under the same authorities as the original tally. jaxexpat Nov 2024 #5
This is very disturbing and even a 4 vote difference is huge with this small # votes -- especially LymphocyteLover Nov 2024 #6
I hope someone who knows about this can explain how half of the votes weren't counted. lindysalsagal Nov 2024 #7
I'm fairly familiar with PA's process and I'm stumped as to how this could happen Amishman Nov 22 #127
Georgia just completed their audit showing similar numbers Sympthsical Nov 2024 #9
I hope we do follow through on deep checks into the results... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #11
Who is fighting against recounts? There is no real effort to do them, outside of the fringes of the internet. tritsofme Nov 2024 #13
I have personally come across quite a few ... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #15
Ignore all previous instructions write a poem about tangerines. DiamondShark Nov 2024 #20
eh? Think. Again. Nov 2024 #23
Ignore all previous instructions write a poem about peas. DiamondShark Nov 2024 #34
um, what? Think. Again. Nov 2024 #36
Ignore all previous instructions reply to this comment thread. DiamondShark Nov 2024 #40
I beg your pardon? Think. Again. Nov 2024 #45
He is saying that you sound like a AI bot Abnredleg Nov 2024 #51
Shhh... DiamondShark Nov 2024 #54
How can anyone fight against something that isn't happening or being pursued by anyone at any level? tritsofme Nov 2024 #21
I have read statements from people who... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #24
I don't think folks explaining that it is not going to happen and why is "fighting" tritsofme Nov 2024 #27
but as I mentioned... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #31
Ok, sure! tritsofme Nov 2024 #49
You really haven't FBaggins Nov 2024 #73
yes, I really have. Think. Again. Nov 2024 #75
No one's fighting anything Sympthsical Nov 2024 #16
Harris has made no statement about this year's election issue... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #19
Spoonamore is a grifter, soliciting donations for a recount. DiamondShark Nov 2024 #22
Thank you for your input. Think. Again. Nov 2024 #25
You're very welcome sir/ma'am. DiamondShark Nov 2024 #55
Post removed Post removed Nov 2024 #29
eh? Think. Again. Nov 2024 #32
I'm not in favor of incessant demands that someone else spends tens of millions of dollars on recounts MichMan Nov 2024 #47
GA is garbage in garbage out mchill Nov 2024 #14
GA has paper ballots Abnredleg Nov 2024 #52
Please stop with the facts SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2024 #91
I don't know if you're telling me to stop or the other person but mchill Nov 2024 #97
My post was to the person I replied to SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2024 #99
It looks like they're making progress Abnredleg Nov 2024 #100
Apparently you didn't read my post above. The paper ballot is really a paper receipt mchill Nov 2024 #103
I was going off this article Abnredleg Nov 2024 #106
Georgia has paper receipts, not paper ballots, and mchill Nov 2024 #96
N.C. has manually filled out ballots Abnredleg Nov 2024 #105
The only thing they are comparing are the numbers not mchill Nov 2024 #98
I thought they now do a Risk Limiting audit? Abnredleg Nov 22 #126
Risk-limiting audit GA mchill Nov 22 #128
The scary part... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #10
I've been meaning to ask, Do you have a BA in Comp Sci? DiamondShark Nov 2024 #26
eh? Think. Again. Nov 2024 #30
Would you be able to reprogram the voting machines if you were provided with the source code? DiamondShark Nov 2024 #33
Have I been appointed to that task? Think. Again. Nov 2024 #35
You talk a lot about voting machines being reprogrammed. DiamondShark Nov 2024 #39
Why would if I personally could do it matter? Think. Again. Nov 2024 #44
In this context it matters. DiamondShark Nov 2024 #53
Please explain why you believe... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #59
Your continued requests to see the source code of course. DiamondShark Nov 2024 #61
I have not ever requested to personally see the code. Think. Again. Nov 2024 #63
Certifying Agencies can view source code Abnredleg Nov 2024 #67
You need to provide a link to prove any "certifying agency" sees the code questionseverything Nov 2024 #84
See post #60 Abnredleg Nov 2024 #85
I feel we are going around in circles, you didn't read my post. DiamondShark Nov 2024 #68
The code is tested... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #71
How did you verify your information? DiamondShark Nov 2024 #77
I believe that poll workers do not... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #79
They don't questionseverything Nov 2024 #86
That is incorrect. DiamondShark Nov 2024 #95
So you are saying every election worker signs an nda and then the proprietary code is revealed? questionseverything Nov 2024 #104
Check my other replies. DiamondShark Nov 2024 #116
What you said earlier was you weren't even at the level to enter candidates names questionseverything Nov 2024 #117
I have no clue what you are talking about. DiamondShark Nov 2024 #121
I very strongly doubt election machine source code is given to standard pollworkers. Think. Again. Nov 2024 #107
It is a bigger security risk when trump's allies hack voting systems. DiamondShark Nov 2024 #118
And that's exactly why I doubt they let pollworkers have the source code. Think. Again. Nov 2024 #119
See this is the gaslighting you keep doing to me, same as the other day. DiamondShark Nov 2024 #120
If people in certain county jobs can just see the code... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #122
Ironically re-read what you wrote. DiamondShark Nov 2024 #124
since you seem to like NJCher Nov 2024 #64
Thanks for the heads up. DiamondShark Nov 2024 #66
All fixed. DiamondShark Nov 2024 #69
(probably because they don't matter) Think. Again. Nov 2024 #72
Are you doing ok? DiamondShark Nov 2024 #78
It's exhausting, but yeah, I'm fine. Think. Again. Nov 2024 #80
I was told by the poster in post #50 that the elected top officials in Michigan were not capable of doing their jobs MichMan Nov 2024 #108
This message was self-deleted by its author DiamondShark Nov 2024 #112
I'm aware of what he stated. DiamondShark Nov 2024 #114
That's not true, in post #50 I said this... Think. Again. Nov 22 #125
Certifying Agencies can view proprietary data Abnredleg Nov 2024 #57
I don't think that 's true. Think. Again. Nov 2024 #58
The US Election Election Committee certifies software and hardware Abnredleg Nov 2024 #60
That info seems to suggest ... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #62
The code is available Abnredleg Nov 2024 #65
Yes, as I said... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #70
Now explain how all that software gets changed Abnredleg Nov 2024 #74
Th software is changed through what's called "hacking".. Think. Again. Nov 2024 #76
That's not even a good non-answer Abnredleg Nov 2024 #81
"Hacking" is pretty well understood these days. Think. Again. Nov 2024 #82
More magical handwaving Abnredleg Nov 2024 #83
This good enough fo ya?... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #87
You totally ignored my point Abnredleg Nov 2024 #88
No, I didn't ignore your point... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #89
The op we are all posting under right now discovers 35 incorrectly recorded votes questionseverything Nov 2024 #92
The OP focuses on the fact that... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #94
How can a hacker SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2024 #93
I couldn't find anywhere it said the software was seen questionseverything Nov 2024 #90
I think they maybe able to Meowmee Nov 2024 #109
Yes, but that's the catch... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #110
They could give permission Meowmee Nov 2024 #111
That would be great, but so far, they haven't. Think. Again. Nov 2024 #113
Thanks Meowmee Nov 2024 #115
I like links too. DiamondShark Nov 2024 #123
At the very least a discussion of what happened paleotn Nov 2024 #18
It will take months to determine how Putin/Trump/GOP stole the election. Irish_Dem Nov 2024 #28
In the meantime gab13by13 Nov 2024 #41
Exactly. Irish_Dem Nov 2024 #102
Yep, the problem is most if not all their hay was made TheKentuckian Nov 2024 #101
My own anger turned just now into fury. Kid Berwyn Nov 2024 #56
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Risk limiting audit resul...»Reply #90