Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

bigtree

(90,536 posts)
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 01:55 PM Nov 20

Bluesky doesn't look to me to be a serious vehicle for our politics yet [View all]

Last edited Wed Nov 20, 2024, 03:20 PM - Edit history (1)

...it's mostly an echo chamber full of witty and wonderful quips from the likes of George Takei, and John Fugelsang; and interesting art and ponderous cartoons; but a dearth of actual news or political debate.

The most visible difference is the absence of pols, pundits, and reporters who need confronting with our disagreements, views, and other perspectives. I'm not sure how Bluesky users postings will find themselves actually meeting newsmakers and other public figures who aren't on the site, where they are or where the public will be influenced by it all.

It's really nice as an enlightening place where good people spend their internet time saying good things, but it doesn't appear to be impacting anything other than it's own users, and even that isn't making much of a noise.

Baby steps, I guess. But until it becomes a place where good people intersect with others with which they have some of the profound and consequential disagreements present in our society today, or develops a strong stream and debating of news and current political events, it's just going to be a nice place for me to visit and nothing more.

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
That isn't true at all -- my feed is almost 100% real news and political discussion obamanut2012 Nov 20 #1
While X is mostly bots and brain rotted people. joshcryer Nov 20 #5
I mean Bluesky obamanut2012 Nov 20 #10
It's a viable news aggregate Dennis Donovan Nov 20 #2
I found very little actual news there bigtree Nov 20 #7
My experience is the exact opposite of yours obamanut2012 Nov 20 #11
Weak and sparse is also the perfect description of a certain DOJ official BannonsLiver Nov 20 #18
Look for starter packs of reporters and news outlets. Qutzupalotl Nov 20 #21
Stick with X if that suits you. Autumn Nov 20 #3
Just join it and post and add people. They have actual moderation. joshcryer Nov 20 #4
mebbe bigtree Nov 20 #9
You're describing what Twitter was like about 10 years ago newdeal2 Nov 20 #6
it does feel new bigtree Nov 20 #8
If that's your view of it, by all means, stay away Blue_Adept Nov 20 #12
Give it time DinahMoeHum Nov 20 #13
need others in order for a maga troll to spread its diseases. amirite?? the logic is profound! Nimble_Idea Nov 20 #14
That is rapidly changing. The platform is growing exponentially. dawg Nov 20 #15
ICYMI: This tool allows you to migrate your followers, followings, and even your block list from X to Bluesky, IcyPeas Nov 20 #16
Thanks for the update, I guess. BannonsLiver Nov 20 #17
It is up to us to make news kansasobama Nov 20 #19
I have no trouble finding news or conversation on Bluesky blogslug Nov 20 #20
it looks like the comment section on DailyKos... WarGamer Nov 20 #22
Interesting BannonsLiver Nov 20 #23
A lot of self-congratulating going on there, too alarimer Nov 20 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bluesky doesn't look to m...