General Discussion

polichick

(37,621 posts)

38. Not furious enough to replace him - which only he could do...

Reply to gab13by13 (Reply #29)

Tue Nov 19, 2024, 10:32 AM

Tuesday

Which he could still do, if he had the guts.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

83 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Garland lovers are still defending him. [View all] onecaliberal Tuesday OP

The rather pathetic arguments that the Attorney General of the United States RockRaven Tuesday #1

DOJ policy didn't stop Bobby Kennedy from going after Hoffa John Shaft Tuesday #15

He violated DOJ policy edhopper Tuesday #45

for whatever reason, they are addicted to him Skittles Tuesday #2

Had to change my position on him IzzaNuDay Tuesday #3

I have sure changed my opinion and i echo you Trueblue1968 Tuesday #4

Yes, the rightwing is done with him... Think. Again. Tuesday #5

He's served his purpose. Scrivener7 Tuesday #18

Extremely well... Think. Again. Tuesday #21

That's what Rebl2 Tuesday #43

thank you Skittles Tuesday #64

Milquetoast Merrick RJ_MacReady Tuesday #6

This message was self-deleted by its author RandiFan1290 Tuesday #7

I lost patience with him three and half years ago. Emile Tuesday #8

There is simply no excuse on the planet for the foot dragging & to let this go unaccounted for. CrispyQ Tuesday #27

I agree. There is no excuse for allowing that. yardwork Tuesday #56

Your post made me laugh Meowmee Tuesday #80

I don't hate him. Tommy Carcetti Tuesday #9

If Trump has an enemies-revenge list, and I believe he does, Garland is on it. Intractable Tuesday #11

Yes. Tommy Carcetti Tuesday #12

I dont hate him either, but the buck should have stopped there. Failed to defend the US. lostnfound Tuesday #13

He was not desirable as a judge either. He was just what Obama thought the Republicans would TheKentuckian Tuesday #14

Well we are seeing the results John Shaft Tuesday #17

Yes Meowmee Tuesday #82

Yes BigMin28 Tuesday #19

Before Mitch change the rule from 60 votes to simple majority for Supreme Court justices Walleye Tuesday #34

If he had done his job, we'd be in a very different world now. Scrivener7 Tuesday #20

After reading the article cited below, I think Garland is a symptom of a much deeper disease. Intractable Tuesday #10

Sarah Kendzior is a russian-paid troll bigtree Tuesday #23

I guess you didn't read the article. Intractable Tuesday #25

she's literally ragging on President Biden bigtree Tuesday #35

So you didn't read the article? Intractable Tuesday #37

I read the trolling of Democrats, yes. bigtree Tuesday #39

"I don't care what she wrote." Intractable Tuesday #41

you posted a known troll of Democrats trolling Democrats bigtree Tuesday #42

Honestly, you want to know what I think? Do you really? Intractable Tuesday #47

bullshit bigtree Tuesday #49

"Bring some facts to the discussion, " Intractable Tuesday #50

you dance around the facts like they don't exist bigtree Tuesday #53

I started to read this, but then realized you didn't read mine. Enough. Intractable Tuesday #57

oh, I read it. bigtree Tuesday #58

Your irrational love for Garland is evidenced by how easily triggered you are. Intractable Tuesday #59

derision is not an argument bigtree Tuesday #60

That's right. I'm glad you finally understand that subtely. Intractable Tuesday #61

you trolled my response with a known troll of Democrats bigtree Tuesday #62

I am not reading this. Garland is the hill you want to die on. Good bye. Intractable Tuesday #63

'I am not reading this.' bigtree Tuesday #65

I'm sure it's more accurate to say no one here is reading you. Intractable Tuesday #66

you mean I'm not in the cool kids club? bigtree Tuesday #68

Please stop humiliating yourself. Intractable Tuesday #69

first you say no one is reading this bigtree Tuesday #70

I'm sorry that you feel you must do this. You removed yourself from the cool kids by not knowing when to quit. Intractable Tuesday #72

you're repeating yourself bigtree Tuesday #76

Post removed Post removed Tuesday #79

For just one more time, I'd like to hear Garland say "No one is above the law." Intractable Tuesday #81

funny bigtree Yesterday #83

At long last still no sense of shame Ponietz Tuesday #46

The mechanism, I think, is the same as the Scrivener7 Tuesday #16

is there something about not enough Democrats caring to show up to defeat an already convicted criminal bigtree Tuesday #22

Voters witnessed justice denied and stayed home. Emile Tuesday #24

Where'd you get that info? Kaleva Tuesday #31

The critical thing is that Biden keeps him in place. polichick Tuesday #26

Yes. What we think doesn't matter Kaleva Tuesday #30

Biden has Garland's back covered Kaleva Tuesday #28

Post removed Post removed Tuesday #32

Garland's one accomplishment gab13by13 Tuesday #29

Not furious enough to replace him - which only he could do... polichick Tuesday #38

When we don't uphold the rule of law while in power the future is bleak Ponietz Tuesday #33

Were they miscalculations? gab13by13 Tuesday #36

I don't even know anymore Ponietz Tuesday #40

It was deliberate. His best friend is the same person purchasing the Supreme Court. onecaliberal Tuesday #78

I at Rebl2 Tuesday #44

I had that thought also when Biden selected her for VP. I wanted her for AG! Intractable Tuesday #48

Who can say it would be different if a criminal was prosecuted and put in prison instead of running for president? onecaliberal Tuesday #51

45 months and counting, republianmushroom Tuesday #52

As one says, like moths to a flame. No matter what , Garland will be defended whenever Autumn Tuesday #54

pleasantly surprised to see many former fans waking up Skittles Tuesday #67

When nobody in Congress was investigated for J6 a lot of us knew then he was going to do nothing Autumn Tuesday #71

now we will have a seditionist as president, who promises retribution Skittles Tuesday #73

Everybody in our party is going to be blamed at one time or another for him winning. I'm going to blame Autumn Tuesday #74

the media held VP Harris to impossible standards, while holding Trump to no standards at all Skittles Tuesday #75

I think Garlands most ardent defender here is an actual Garland family member. BannonsLiver Tuesday #55

I despise the way he talks and his actions bob4460 Tuesday #77