Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If there was cheating in the last election... [View all]DiamondShark
(1,107 posts)79. I think vetting the person you are promoting in these posts is the best path forward.
I also await any proof Spoonamore, or the other experts that are sounding the alarm, to post their proof.
I know I did my job to secure our elections against bad actors in the major elections 2016, 2018, 2020. And during the minor elections in the off years. My former co-workers do the same, past and present. I spoke with a former co-worker about 2022 and 2024, and she retired before the 2024 general election. She stated nothing major has changed since I worked there.
I Implore you to read my other replies I made to you Friday night, outside that, I don't understand why you are focusing me quoting Spoonamore's statement about being a republicans in his letter to Harris/Walz.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Absolutely, the allegations in the first letter from the cybersecurity expert group must be carefully investigated also
Think. Again.
Nov 17
#47
Oh, you mean like any allegation of a crime having been committed? Would those be woo's?
Think. Again.
Nov 17
#48
Spoonamore claims to be a republican in the Nov-15-24 letter that is circulating.
DiamondShark
Nov 17
#37
I think vetting the person you are promoting in these posts is the best path forward.
DiamondShark
Nov 17
#79
If I do, will that make all the digitized tabulation machines disappear or something?
Think. Again.
Nov 17
#85
You would learn how we public workers secure our elections against bad actors.
DiamondShark
Nov 17
#86
After 2004 major security laws and procedures were put in place and thousands of voting machines were replaced.
Think. Again.
Nov 17
#30
He doesn't address the question of citizens being able to oversee their own elections
questionseverything
Nov 16
#8
The obvious idea is that using 2 different processes to count the same numbers will expose discrepencies.
Think. Again.
Nov 17
#32
Correct, discrepencies discovered during audits would then prompt full recounts to arrive at true results.
Think. Again.
Nov 17
#58
Except that "non-binding" audits would not necessarily lead to recounts if a candidate doesn't request that...
Think. Again.
Nov 17
#63
Arizona Republicans wanted to hand-count ballots. Then they saw the price tag -- and the errors.
MichMan
Nov 17
#43
Wisconsin is like 30,000 though, that's about 9 vote change per precinct
questionseverything
Nov 17
#23