Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If there was cheating in the last election... [View all]NJCher
(37,936 posts)16. This is a sweeping claim
The President, the Vice-President, and every leader in our party just somehow missed the entire country being rigged after they blitzed an ad campaign all year about how fortified and secure our elections are after making changes since 2020? Or they did notice, but don't care somehow?
This is not a realistic expectation to have. Also I think you exaggerating the claim.
Furthermore, I do not know of the campaign about secure elections. Can you point out an ad?
Go read the story posted from pnwmom: How team Trump/Musk spent $45 million on market tested fake ads
Harris & Walz did notice what was going on. They tried to get the ads that looked like imitations stopped. Google stopped only one. Facebook did nothing.
This is not a realistic expectation to have. Also I think you exaggerating the claim.
Furthermore, I do not know of the campaign about secure elections. Can you point out an ad?
Go read the story posted from pnwmom: How team Trump/Musk spent $45 million on market tested fake ads
Harris & Walz did notice what was going on. They tried to get the ads that looked like imitations stopped. Google stopped only one. Facebook did nothing.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Absolutely, the allegations in the first letter from the cybersecurity expert group must be carefully investigated also
Think. Again.
Nov 17
#47
Oh, you mean like any allegation of a crime having been committed? Would those be woo's?
Think. Again.
Nov 17
#48
Spoonamore claims to be a republican in the Nov-15-24 letter that is circulating.
DiamondShark
Nov 17
#37
I think vetting the person you are promoting in these posts is the best path forward.
DiamondShark
Nov 17
#79
If I do, will that make all the digitized tabulation machines disappear or something?
Think. Again.
Nov 17
#85
You would learn how we public workers secure our elections against bad actors.
DiamondShark
Nov 17
#86
After 2004 major security laws and procedures were put in place and thousands of voting machines were replaced.
Think. Again.
Nov 17
#30
He doesn't address the question of citizens being able to oversee their own elections
questionseverything
Nov 16
#8
The obvious idea is that using 2 different processes to count the same numbers will expose discrepencies.
Think. Again.
Nov 17
#32
Correct, discrepencies discovered during audits would then prompt full recounts to arrive at true results.
Think. Again.
Nov 17
#58
Except that "non-binding" audits would not necessarily lead to recounts if a candidate doesn't request that...
Think. Again.
Nov 17
#63
Arizona Republicans wanted to hand-count ballots. Then they saw the price tag -- and the errors.
MichMan
Nov 17
#43
Wisconsin is like 30,000 though, that's about 9 vote change per precinct
questionseverything
Nov 17
#23