General Discussion

Mr.Bee

(351 posts)

52. If it were Kamala who had received millions of 'Bullet Ballots'

Reply to MadameButterfly (Original post)

Sat Nov 16, 2024, 01:02 PM

Saturday

REPUBLICANS WOULD BE RUNNING AND SCREAMING UP AND DOWN THE HALLS OF CONGRESS AND ON FOXNEWSMAX 'STEAL! STOP THIS STEAL! RECOUNT! RECOUNT!
And that's a fact!
If there was no wrong-doing, there is nothing anyone should object to.
Let's prove it was a free and fair election!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

73 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Should DU demand a recount? [View all] MadameButterfly Saturday OP

dont they compare the number of ballots to the final number of votes? Blues Heron Saturday #1

Yes Abnredleg Saturday #3

Most of those audits are non-bindibg on the final vote count. Think. Again. Saturday #8

Then what is the pointof an audit? MadameButterfly Saturday #11

Here is a map of which states hold their audits as binding on the outcome... Think. Again. Saturday #16

Non binding does not mean ignore Abnredleg Saturday #13

Actual information on binding audits can be found here: Think. Again. Saturday #17

The results are made pubic as part of the certification process Abnredleg Saturday #14

The rules and regulations, and processes, for audits vary from state to state... Think. Again. Saturday #19

thanks for the link... stillcool Saturday #20

Why do we have to dig out this information???? Farmer-Rick Saturday #29

I'd really like to see Marc Elias' take on all this, at the very least. Think. Again. Saturday #34

I just feel abandoned by Democratic leaders Farmer-Rick Saturday #50

I don't want random audits: I want full audits, and hand counts of all the ballots in the states that trump won. BComplex Saturday #21

I agree.. Think. Again. Saturday #36

I can't respond to how this would have been done MadameButterfly Saturday #10

Even if the Daily Kos article was bullshit, and maybe taken down from the site, or whatever, it still does not BComplex Saturday #22

The CISA does not support this conclusion osteopath6 Saturday #32

Please correct your title, the CISA has NOT made any statement about this conclusion. Think. Again. Saturday #56

Here is a working link to the original Daily Kos article... Think. Again. Saturday #55

Thank-you! Yes, we owe it to our children and the planet to make that demand. polichick Saturday #2

Do we have that power? Surely there would be allies in other venues bucolic_frolic Saturday #4

We should use whatever power our voices DO have. Think. Again. Saturday #6

And here is yet another letter sent to Harris from cybersecurity experts... Think. Again. Saturday #5

Thanks Farmer-Rick Saturday #28

I'm trying to tell myself... Think. Again. Saturday #30

Scary if true osteopath6 Saturday #35

When was that statement made? Was it before the evidence we're discussing surfaced? Think. Again. Saturday #39

Because, if it were compromised, it would make them look bad asm128 Saturday #48

Thanks for posting this and the other letter in a separate OP MadameButterfly Sunday #70

Who would be paying for this,I wonder... Conjuay Saturday #7

The USA? Think. Again. Saturday #9

Who paid for Arizona nd 2x Georgia in 2020? MadameButterfly Saturday #18

Here is the article from substack... Think. Again. Saturday #12

K&R 2naSalit Saturday #15

YES times 1000 CommonHumanity Saturday #23

Marc Elias swears that this election was legit. He is not accounting for the very specific targets that BComplex Saturday #24

Do you have a link to the Elias statement? Think. Again. Saturday #40

Or the guy who has been doing the actual work dismisses the conspiracy EdmondDantes_ Saturday #46

We're supposed to prove fraud before MadameButterfly 7 hrs ago #72

I say yes Meowmee Saturday #25

Has Trump ever done anything in his life where he didn't cheat? kentuck Saturday #26

"Every accusation is a confession" GiqueCee Saturday #27

no not yet dotsconnect Saturday #31

Here's the Substack link to his Duty to Warn letter Native Saturday #33

thank you! nt orleans Saturday #45

A party that gave us FAKE ELECTORS cheat? Emile Saturday #37

Only 29 states have laws binding their electors to vote according to the popular vote EX500rider Saturday #38

Yes, demand a recount would be my vote as a DU member since 2008. usaf-vet Saturday #41

I agree that we need to shift focus to LEGAL battles! FirstLight Saturday #42

The quoted "350,000" figure for North Carolina seems wrong muriel_volestrangler Saturday #43

And people can look up the numbers for themselves Sympthsical Saturday #47

The only reference I've seen was an estimate of 600,000 spread among the swing states. Think. Again. Saturday #61

Here's access to that website... Think. Again. Saturday #60

short and simple bdamomma Saturday #44

Yes nt Hope22 Saturday #49

how does du go about calling for a recount? nt orleans Saturday #51

I think it would have to be a letter writing MadameButterfly Saturday #58

i sent a link to that substack "duty to warn letter - to vp harris" orleans Saturday #67

Good. I'll send it and the other letter to some people MadameButterfly Saturday #68

I just wrote to Biden, and Harris for them to ask for recounts in the Swing States, and why. electric_blue68 Saturday #69

If it were Kamala who had received millions of 'Bullet Ballots' Mr.Bee Saturday #52

are we talking about millions of bullet ballots MadameButterfly Saturday #57

absolutely gopiscrap Saturday #53

I was finally able to retrieve a non-paywall link to the Daily Koz article... Think. Again. Saturday #54

Thanks! MadameButterfly Saturday #59

All I'm saying is this... Blue_Tires Saturday #62

Look at whatever Trump is accusing us of and that's what he is doing MadameButterfly Saturday #65

Nobody here can stop any other DUer from doing that Kaleva Saturday #63

The only reason to work together is there is power in numbers MadameButterfly Saturday #64

True but it just takes a few, or even one, to begin the process Kaleva Saturday #66

Absolutely BoRaGard Sunday #71

recount! JoeBydun 6 hrs ago #73