Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

usaf-vet

(6,892 posts)
41. Yes, demand a recount would be my vote as a DU member since 2008.
Sat Nov 16, 2024, 11:58 AM
Saturday
Yes, for demanding a recount would be my vote as a DU member since 2008.
Should DU demand a recount? [View all] MadameButterfly Saturday OP
dont they compare the number of ballots to the final number of votes? Blues Heron Saturday #1
Yes Abnredleg Saturday #3
Most of those audits are non-bindibg on the final vote count. Think. Again. Saturday #8
Then what is the pointof an audit? MadameButterfly Saturday #11
Here is a map of which states hold their audits as binding on the outcome... Think. Again. Saturday #16
Non binding does not mean ignore Abnredleg Saturday #13
Actual information on binding audits can be found here: Think. Again. Saturday #17
The results are made pubic as part of the certification process Abnredleg Saturday #14
The rules and regulations, and processes, for audits vary from state to state... Think. Again. Saturday #19
thanks for the link... stillcool Saturday #20
Why do we have to dig out this information???? Farmer-Rick Saturday #29
I'd really like to see Marc Elias' take on all this, at the very least. Think. Again. Saturday #34
I just feel abandoned by Democratic leaders Farmer-Rick Saturday #50
I don't want random audits: I want full audits, and hand counts of all the ballots in the states that trump won. BComplex Saturday #21
I agree.. Think. Again. Saturday #36
I can't respond to how this would have been done MadameButterfly Saturday #10
Even if the Daily Kos article was bullshit, and maybe taken down from the site, or whatever, it still does not BComplex Saturday #22
The CISA does not support this conclusion osteopath6 Saturday #32
Please correct your title, the CISA has NOT made any statement about this conclusion. Think. Again. Saturday #56
Here is a working link to the original Daily Kos article... Think. Again. Saturday #55
Thank-you! Yes, we owe it to our children and the planet to make that demand. polichick Saturday #2
Do we have that power? Surely there would be allies in other venues bucolic_frolic Saturday #4
We should use whatever power our voices DO have. Think. Again. Saturday #6
And here is yet another letter sent to Harris from cybersecurity experts... Think. Again. Saturday #5
Thanks Farmer-Rick Saturday #28
I'm trying to tell myself... Think. Again. Saturday #30
Scary if true osteopath6 Saturday #35
When was that statement made? Was it before the evidence we're discussing surfaced? Think. Again. Saturday #39
Because, if it were compromised, it would make them look bad asm128 Saturday #48
Thanks for posting this and the other letter in a separate OP MadameButterfly Sunday #70
Who would be paying for this,I wonder... Conjuay Saturday #7
The USA? Think. Again. Saturday #9
Who paid for Arizona nd 2x Georgia in 2020? MadameButterfly Saturday #18
Here is the article from substack... Think. Again. Saturday #12
K&R 2naSalit Saturday #15
YES times 1000 CommonHumanity Saturday #23
Marc Elias swears that this election was legit. He is not accounting for the very specific targets that BComplex Saturday #24
Do you have a link to the Elias statement? Think. Again. Saturday #40
Or the guy who has been doing the actual work dismisses the conspiracy EdmondDantes_ Saturday #46
We're supposed to prove fraud before MadameButterfly 7 hrs ago #72
I say yes Meowmee Saturday #25
Has Trump ever done anything in his life where he didn't cheat? kentuck Saturday #26
"Every accusation is a confession" GiqueCee Saturday #27
no not yet dotsconnect Saturday #31
Here's the Substack link to his Duty to Warn letter Native Saturday #33
thank you! nt orleans Saturday #45
A party that gave us FAKE ELECTORS cheat? Emile Saturday #37
Only 29 states have laws binding their electors to vote according to the popular vote EX500rider Saturday #38
Yes, demand a recount would be my vote as a DU member since 2008. usaf-vet Saturday #41
I agree that we need to shift focus to LEGAL battles! FirstLight Saturday #42
The quoted "350,000" figure for North Carolina seems wrong muriel_volestrangler Saturday #43
And people can look up the numbers for themselves Sympthsical Saturday #47
The only reference I've seen was an estimate of 600,000 spread among the swing states. Think. Again. Saturday #61
Here's access to that website... Think. Again. Saturday #60
short and simple bdamomma Saturday #44
Yes nt Hope22 Saturday #49
how does du go about calling for a recount? nt orleans Saturday #51
I think it would have to be a letter writing MadameButterfly Saturday #58
i sent a link to that substack "duty to warn letter - to vp harris" orleans Saturday #67
Good. I'll send it and the other letter to some people MadameButterfly Saturday #68
I just wrote to Biden, and Harris for them to ask for recounts in the Swing States, and why. electric_blue68 Saturday #69
If it were Kamala who had received millions of 'Bullet Ballots' Mr.Bee Saturday #52
are we talking about millions of bullet ballots MadameButterfly Saturday #57
absolutely gopiscrap Saturday #53
I was finally able to retrieve a non-paywall link to the Daily Koz article... Think. Again. Saturday #54
Thanks! MadameButterfly Saturday #59
All I'm saying is this... Blue_Tires Saturday #62
Look at whatever Trump is accusing us of and that's what he is doing MadameButterfly Saturday #65
Nobody here can stop any other DUer from doing that Kaleva Saturday #63
The only reason to work together is there is power in numbers MadameButterfly Saturday #64
True but it just takes a few, or even one, to begin the process Kaleva Saturday #66
Absolutely BoRaGard Sunday #71
recount! JoeBydun 7 hrs ago #73
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should DU demand a recoun...»Reply #41