General Discussion

Think. Again.

(18,281 posts)

34. I'd really like to see Marc Elias' take on all this, at the very least.

Reply to Farmer-Rick (Reply #29)

Sat Nov 16, 2024, 11:32 AM

Nov 16

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

74 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Should DU demand a recount? [View all] MadameButterfly Nov 16 OP

dont they compare the number of ballots to the final number of votes? Blues Heron Nov 16 #1

Yes Abnredleg Nov 16 #3

Most of those audits are non-bindibg on the final vote count. Think. Again. Nov 16 #8

Then what is the pointof an audit? MadameButterfly Nov 16 #11

Here is a map of which states hold their audits as binding on the outcome... Think. Again. Nov 16 #16

Non binding does not mean ignore Abnredleg Nov 16 #13

Actual information on binding audits can be found here: Think. Again. Nov 16 #17

The results are made pubic as part of the certification process Abnredleg Nov 16 #14

The rules and regulations, and processes, for audits vary from state to state... Think. Again. Nov 16 #19

thanks for the link... stillcool Nov 16 #20

Why do we have to dig out this information???? Farmer-Rick Nov 16 #29

I'd really like to see Marc Elias' take on all this, at the very least. Think. Again. Nov 16 #34

I just feel abandoned by Democratic leaders Farmer-Rick Nov 16 #50

I don't want random audits: I want full audits, and hand counts of all the ballots in the states that trump won. BComplex Nov 16 #21

I agree.. Think. Again. Nov 16 #36

I can't respond to how this would have been done MadameButterfly Nov 16 #10

Even if the Daily Kos article was bullshit, and maybe taken down from the site, or whatever, it still does not BComplex Nov 16 #22

The CISA does not support this conclusion osteopath6 Nov 16 #32

Please correct your title, the CISA has NOT made any statement about this conclusion. Think. Again. Nov 16 #56

Here is a working link to the original Daily Kos article... Think. Again. Nov 16 #55

This message was self-deleted by its author polichick Nov 16 #2

Do we have that power? Surely there would be allies in other venues bucolic_frolic Nov 16 #4

We should use whatever power our voices DO have. Think. Again. Nov 16 #6

And here is yet another letter sent to Harris from cybersecurity experts... Think. Again. Nov 16 #5

Thanks Farmer-Rick Nov 16 #28

I'm trying to tell myself... Think. Again. Nov 16 #30

Scary if true osteopath6 Nov 16 #35

When was that statement made? Was it before the evidence we're discussing surfaced? Think. Again. Nov 16 #39

Because, if it were compromised, it would make them look bad asm128 Nov 16 #48

Thanks for posting this and the other letter in a separate OP MadameButterfly Nov 17 #70

Who would be paying for this,I wonder... Conjuay Nov 16 #7

The USA? Think. Again. Nov 16 #9

Who paid for Arizona nd 2x Georgia in 2020? MadameButterfly Nov 16 #18

Here is the article from substack... Think. Again. Nov 16 #12

K&R 2naSalit Nov 16 #15

YES times 1000 CommonHumanity Nov 16 #23

Marc Elias swears that this election was legit. He is not accounting for the very specific targets that BComplex Nov 16 #24

Do you have a link to the Elias statement? Think. Again. Nov 16 #40

Or the guy who has been doing the actual work dismisses the conspiracy EdmondDantes_ Nov 16 #46

We're supposed to prove fraud before MadameButterfly Nov 20 #72

I say yes Meowmee Nov 16 #25

Has Trump ever done anything in his life where he didn't cheat? kentuck Nov 16 #26

"Every accusation is a confession" GiqueCee Nov 16 #27

no not yet dotsconnect Nov 16 #31

Here's the Substack link to his Duty to Warn letter Native Nov 16 #33

thank you! nt orleans Nov 16 #45

Thank you for that link! BComplex Nov 21 #74

A party that gave us FAKE ELECTORS cheat? Emile Nov 16 #37

Only 29 states have laws binding their electors to vote according to the popular vote EX500rider Nov 16 #38

Yes, demand a recount would be my vote as a DU member since 2008. usaf-vet Nov 16 #41

I agree that we need to shift focus to LEGAL battles! FirstLight Nov 16 #42

The quoted "350,000" figure for North Carolina seems wrong muriel_volestrangler Nov 16 #43

And people can look up the numbers for themselves Sympthsical Nov 16 #47

The only reference I've seen was an estimate of 600,000 spread among the swing states. Think. Again. Nov 16 #61

Here's access to that website... Think. Again. Nov 16 #60

short and simple bdamomma Nov 16 #44

Yes nt Hope22 Nov 16 #49

how does du go about calling for a recount? nt orleans Nov 16 #51

I think it would have to be a letter writing MadameButterfly Nov 16 #58

i sent a link to that substack "duty to warn letter - to vp harris" orleans Nov 16 #67

Good. I'll send it and the other letter to some people MadameButterfly Nov 16 #68

I just wrote to Biden, and Harris for them to ask for recounts in the Swing States, and why. electric_blue68 Nov 16 #69

If it were Kamala who had received millions of 'Bullet Ballots' Mr.Bee Nov 16 #52

are we talking about millions of bullet ballots MadameButterfly Nov 16 #57

absolutely gopiscrap Nov 16 #53

I was finally able to retrieve a non-paywall link to the Daily Koz article... Think. Again. Nov 16 #54

Thanks! MadameButterfly Nov 16 #59

All I'm saying is this... Blue_Tires Nov 16 #62

Look at whatever Trump is accusing us of and that's what he is doing MadameButterfly Nov 16 #65

Nobody here can stop any other DUer from doing that Kaleva Nov 16 #63

The only reason to work together is there is power in numbers MadameButterfly Nov 16 #64

True but it just takes a few, or even one, to begin the process Kaleva Nov 16 #66

Absolutely BoRaGard Nov 17 #71

recount! JoeBydun Nov 20 #73