Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I'm surprised at how little discussion there is questioning the results. [View all]dchill
(40,470 posts)86. You really can't say that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
163 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm surprised at how little discussion there is questioning the results. [View all]
garybeck
Nov 11
OP
We are supposed to believe that ruthless, vicious, desperate psychopaths followed the rules and laws.
Irish_Dem
Nov 11
#1
I am fairly certain that a version of this scenario has occurred with certain members of congress.
Irish_Dem
Nov 11
#72
Yep, and now we have to deal with a senile-adjacent, bloviating fool delivering mental weave for 4 years.
brush
Nov 12
#129
I'll take my cues from the DNC and the Harris/Walz campaign. I sure wish the left...
LAS14
Nov 11
#91
CONSPIRACY THEORY? REALLY?!! Well, what about the VERBATIM statement give by Nikolai Patrushev, a member of pootie's
The_REAL_Ecumenist
Nov 12
#135
I am sure the Russian/Chinese military hackers were able to figure all of this out.
Irish_Dem
Nov 11
#109
We heard for four years that the election was stolen. I doubt the public wants to hear it another four
jimfields33
Nov 12
#126
You do understand that evidence you are requiring for audits and recounts...
Think. Again.
Saturday
#158
I guess highly circumstantial to very speculative is a notch or two above baseless
TheKentuckian
Nov 11
#21
We were deriding/mocking/ridiculing way before the investigations/court cases were completed
kelly1mm
Nov 11
#46
And they went through 60 court cases. The AP called this election that first night.
pnwmom
Nov 11
#40
They can be filed as soon as they can be prepared. And R's will deride/mock/ridicule us just like we did them. nt
kelly1mm
Nov 11
#47
I do not believe there was any credible reports of hacking if you are referring to vote switching
kelly1mm
Nov 11
#52
According to Greg Palast, there were 2.7 million rejected provisional ballots last time.
pnwmom
Nov 11
#88
Being 'a fascist lunatic trying to take over the country' is not evidence of voting irregularities. Can you
kelly1mm
Nov 11
#110
Yes it is imo, it's not normal to tell your voters. They don't have to vote because you already have the votes since whe
Meowmee
Nov 11
#111
He said they would not need to vote 'next time'. He said he needed their votes now and then
kelly1mm
Nov 11
#112
We lost. No recount, court case, protest, etc., is going to change that. We have mid-terms coming.
Silent Type
Nov 11
#4
It's not about sulking. Do you really think Trump would allow fair mid terms if they succeeded
pnwmom
Nov 11
#44
Except he didn't flip 2024. If Harris, Biden, etc., believe results were correct, I'll continue to move on. We lost.
Silent Type
Nov 11
#50
If they got away with fixing this election, why would anything be different in the midterms? nt
pnwmom
Nov 11
#41
Well, yeah, if the got away with fixing election. But don't think they did and I'm not a GOPer type election denier.
Silent Type
Nov 11
#78
There aren't going to be any more elections. I heard it form the Dump himself.
Clouds Passing
Nov 11
#62
They've spent eight years softening up public reaction to this argument, and made such a fuss
lees1975
Nov 11
#8
Our highest elected officials on a State level have been assuring voters for over three years
MichMan
Nov 11
#9
Based on what direct evidence? No, a report from twenty years ago nor Lichtmans non scientific keys qualify.
TheKentuckian
Nov 11
#43
Didn't say they were. The OP asked why isn't there more discussion when the site is riddled with threads about it.
Fish700
Friday
#143
No. It's questioning our democratic process with little to no evidence. Just like Trump did.
ColinC
Nov 11
#23
Sounds like you're saying is Trump's complaints after 2020 should have been taken more seriously and given more credence
onenote
Nov 11
#28
His cases were taken seriously. There were 60 court cases. How many have we had? nt
pnwmom
Nov 11
#45
onenote, why are you ALWAYS a naysayer about challenging the validity of Trump's suspicious "victory"?
ElementaryPenguin
Friday
#145
Just because there are likely ongoing election investigations that can't yet be revealed, nevermind reported.
ancianita
Nov 11
#31
ALL the votes haven't been counted. When they are it wont be millions & millions fewer
hootman
Nov 11
#32
I agree 100%. I am astounded that some are accepting this and that the leaders are not making issues of all of this.
58Sunliner
Nov 11
#35
No, no, no. Sorry. I think at least some of this is being pushed by Russian and other psyops.
LauraInLA
Nov 11
#37
But if Repubs go low, Dems go high, and the electorate rewards that with respect and votes. Oh, wait...
Beartracks
Nov 11
#48
Both things can be true - we live in a country of many idiots and the vote was hacked as well.
ElementaryPenguin
Friday
#146
Recount means run through the machines with a "mix" of hand counting
questionseverything
Friday
#144
This plus the fact that nearly the entire country saw a rightward shift
DetroitLegalBeagle
Nov 11
#107
If there are mandated random hand audits that are properly run and results compared to...
yourout
Nov 11
#102
There won't be a 'next election' - every expert on authoritarianism has explained this.
polichick
Saturday
#153
Do full audits/recounts and forensic investigation every election in every state
Meowmee
Saturday
#150