I'm surprised at how little discussion there is questioning the results.

[garybeck]

I realize people who don't understand voting and election technology are going to say i'm a foolish conspiracy theorist. Go ahead i can take it.

But I know there are enough people here at DU who have studied election technology. There are experts in the field reading this. We've been through this before.

It's not a foolish conspiracy theory. Questioning the results is healthy. Especially considering the fact that we have been warned by the world's most prominent computer security experts. They told us that our election system is "has significant security vulnerabilities."



You can laugh and brush it off and say what you will. the truth is, our election system is hackable. It's been demonstrated and documented many times by the world's best, and not much has been done.

Before you say "the democratic party would be on top of this" or "the election system is not connected to the internet" ... take a deep breath. It doesn't have to be through the internet. and just because the democratic party doesn't know about computer security, it doesn't mean anything one way or another.

You're not a conspiracy theorist if you are simply asking questions.
I"m not suggesting the election was definitely stolen.
I am saying it smells fishy.

we need to be asking ourselves some serious questions like:

Are we really supposed to believe that millions of less people voted this time than last?
Are we really supposed to believe that trump got more support this time than last time, and he actually got the popular vote this time which he never has before, when by all accounts his support has diminished over the last 4 years?
Why were so many experts like Lichtman wrong? He's called every election correct in the last several decades. Michael Moore who predicted Trump victory in 2016 when no one else was, had called it for Harris. many others.
If anyone on this planet could hack the system, who could? Perhaps the richest person in the world owns multiple high tech companies and was literally campaigning for Trump?
If criminals can hack into the country's hospital system and basically shut down multiple hospitals and doctors offices for weeks, just for a ransom, why do we believe hacking the election system is impossible?
Which is more likely -- millions of people voting in ways that were not predicted, or just one thing - the richest person on the planet with access to every technology known, and who was campaigning for Trump, got involved. One of those two things happened.
Why was Trump so despondent the last few weeks? He seemed to not care about votes. He made zero attempt to move towards the center, which is what every candidate does when they need votes. he cancelled events and didn't seem to care. Did he know something we don't know?
Enthusiasm for Harris was very high. we all saw it. we are being told to just toss that out the window. it was a mirage. the enthusiasm was dismal for trump.

And, importantly:

if you had unlimited money and access to literally every technology on the planet, would it be possible to hack the election system?
the answer to that, we already know is yes. the experts have told us this time and time again. Here is a list of experts who signed on to the Brennan Report:



those of us who are expressing concern are not just making this up. and we're not foolish. Fools refuse to look at facts. Smart people investigate objectively with an open mind.
we've been warned by the greatest computer security experts on the planet.