Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 'Jesus, Enough with the Queen!' Howard Stern Fumes Over 'Annoying' Media Coverage of Monarch [View all]DFW
(60,211 posts)80. I don't get US TV here, it's true
I don't think I was missing out on much, either, even while the Queen was still alive.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
119 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
'Jesus, Enough with the Queen!' Howard Stern Fumes Over 'Annoying' Media Coverage of Monarch [View all]
Mr. Sparkle
Sep 2022
OP
We have a free press & the right to tell the press we're SICK of this endless, fawning coverage.
pnwmom
Sep 2022
#64
Yes, they are free to lose their credibility with those in their audience who expect them to report
pnwmom
Sep 2022
#106
I doubt that there are millions of viewers who want to see endless scenes of the cathedral,
pnwmom
Sep 2022
#111
And probably about 7% of them are part English, and the coverage is driving others away.
pnwmom
Sep 2022
#115
What I noticed was that Fox was covering Royalty much less than MSNBC and CNN was.
pnwmom
Sep 2022
#117
I'm with ya. Got jumped all over Saturday for saying about the same thing.
Liberal In Texas
Sep 2022
#104
Personally, I'd rather see the issue with Monarch butterflies covered more than I'd like to see...
NNadir
Sep 2022
#108
I don't understand an American without an English background to make a comment like yours.
pnwmom
Sep 2022
#63
So when the King of Belgium will pass out, I guess we'll get two weeks of coverage too, or...
Justice matters.
Sep 2022
#83
N0 he is not. That is just your opinion. Stern is fun to listen to - not annoying at all.
Tommymac
Sep 2022
#47
In this case he is annoyingly correct. Annoying to lovers of an obsolete and expensive monarchy,
Martin68
Sep 2022
#75
Stern is one of those people not bright enough to self moderate their own viewing
ripcord
Sep 2022
#8
Hey, history buff here. I appreciate the coverage of the Queen-related events.
calimary
Sep 2022
#70
I agree. I'm sure TFG is deeply annoyed that someone else is dominating the news.
Ocelot II
Sep 2022
#74
"Donald Trump flew to Washington" wouldn't be filling your TV as an alternative...
brooklynite
Sep 2022
#100
It's been a LOT. And they will drag it out for at least another week at maximum coverage...
liberalla
Sep 2022
#23
Watch or don't watch a glimpse of extreme pagentry celebrating a 70-year reign.
housecat
Sep 2022
#30
Balderdash. Suggesting that the Queen and her monarchy are detrimental to the nation is not
Martin68
Sep 2022
#76
It seemed you were suggesting that people like Stern who criticize the Queen do so because
Martin68
Sep 2022
#92
Maybe you're too far away from DC to understand how annoying it is to have actual US news
pnwmom
Sep 2022
#67
On MSNBC, CNN, and the local stations, we've been seeing almost as much Royalty coverage
pnwmom
Sep 2022
#85
Today there was a filing in the Special Master case, and I'm sure we'd be hearing all about it
pnwmom
Sep 2022
#95
So a guy with a fan base is unhappy with fan obsession about the British royals...
brooklynite
Sep 2022
#68
Howard Stern actually does something, whether you agree with his opinion or not. The Queen has been
Martin68
Sep 2022
#77
The problem is that the funeral coverage, and royalty coverage "Charles looks every inch a king!"
pnwmom
Sep 2022
#86
You don't feel the need to vent your spleen about their social-political structure,
Martin68
Sep 2022
#93