Richard Mack, R, AZ running for Congress said Parkland survivors sound like Hitler..

[riversedge]

5. This is very interesting. He won a SC case--basically, the Feds can not commandeer local law

enforcement to do background checks on guns. whow.


http://www.worldtribune.com/arizona-candidate-calls-for-live-televised-roundtable-with-outspoken-shooting-survivors/
...........................
Mack, who is currently running for Congress in the 8th Congressional District of Arizona, took the lead role in a 1997 case that challenged the constitutionality of provisions in the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act.

In Mack v. United States (also known as Printz v. United States), Mack and a group of county sheriffs challenged the constitutionality of a provision in the Brady Act “that required county sheriffs to carry out at the behest of Congress background checks on gun purchasers”.

Arguing that such provisions violate the 10th Amendment, Mack and his associates were forced, after an adverse ruling by the notoriously leftist Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, to appeal to the Supreme Court, The New American reported.

In June of 1997, the Supreme Court, led by Justice Antonin Scalia, overturned the Ninth Circuit Court’s ruling, and found that the commandeering of local law enforcement by Congress did indeed constitute a violation of the 10th Amendment.”