Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Populist Reform of the Democratic Party

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
Wed Jun 17, 2015, 06:27 PM Jun 2015

This Ain't 1972 [View all]

Last edited Wed Jun 17, 2015, 07:19 PM - Edit history (2)

I just read a post here on DU where a kindly soul warned us all that Bernie Sanders was our modern George McGovern, having absolutely zero chances of winning an election.

Though I'm sure that the warning was given out of the goodness of his/her heart I started counting all the ways that this election was like that election.

What a task! I had to stop when I got to Zero!

I just don't see how 2016 compares to 1972...we've lived through a generation of profound changes since that year. As Bill Nye the Science Guy used to say: "Consider the following..."


  • In 1972, a black man had no chance of running for the Presidency, let alone winning it twice.

  • In 1972, a woman had no chance of getting the Democratic party nomination, let alone being the front runner.

  • In 1972, being in favor of gay marriage was a career killer.

  • In 1972, banks were regulated and couldn't destroy the economy.

  • In 1972, we had not already lived through 20-30 years of trickle down economics.

  • In 1972, there was no Citizens United to act as a lightning rod.

  • In 1972, there wasn't a clown car full of insane Republicans running against us (and each other).

  • In 1972, there was no Internet to organize the troops.

  • In 1972, these thing's didn't all come together to create a perfect storm for populist reform.

  • Most importantly, in 1972 we didn't have Bernie Sanders to kick some corporate ass!

So hey all you worry warriors? While we appreciate your sincere concerns, we really don't share them.
This ain't 1972. Bernie Sanders isn't repeating history. He's making history.
77 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This Ain't 1972 [View all] demwing Jun 2015 OP
I read that the other day too, silly it was. randys1 Jun 2015 #1
correct me if I'm wrong but in 1972 a woman couldn't enroll in Yale. roguevalley Jun 2015 #11
That was the year "The Godfather" came out.... Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2015 #18
FWIW, the jowls were Brando's own idea. merrily Jun 2015 #34
He did a great job on that role. Especially when you consider his other big role that year.... Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2015 #35
I never saw that. Every actor I've heard speak of him says he was a genius actor, though. merrily Jun 2015 #37
I don't think it's ever been on cable. Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2015 #41
Actually, Yale admitted its first women undergraduates in 1969 Lydia Leftcoast Jun 2015 #23
You're wrong... k8conant Feb 2016 #76
I also did, but don't think I got a response.. what's the possibility I missed something? Volaris Jun 2015 #15
Yes! rbnyc Jun 2015 #28
I agree Jenny_92808 Feb 2016 #73
Whoa!! very good! wendylaroux Jun 2015 #2
On June 17, 1972, Nixon's henchmen were burglarizing Democratic HQ in Watergate building LiberalEsto Jun 2015 #3
You're missing one important change jeff47 Jun 2015 #4
Damn straight! onecaliberal Jun 2015 #5
We also won't be running against an incumbent Doctor_J Jun 2015 #6
Huge K&R! MannyGoldstein Jun 2015 #7
Heck, IMO Bernie is MORE electable in the general election than HRC... ReallyIAmAnOptimist Jun 2015 #8
I definitely agree with that - n/t dreamnightwind Jun 2015 #49
saying a lot heaven05 Jun 2015 #9
1972 I was eighteen. Unknown Beatle Jun 2015 #10
Right On, Brother!!! Thespian2 Jun 2015 #12
Fuckin' A Bubba! Fuddnik Jun 2015 #13
excellent post! barbtries Jun 2015 #14
Presidential incumbency carries a lot of weight in an election rurallib Jun 2015 #16
how about walter mondale 1984 captainarizona Jun 2015 #17
This is the populist reform group, not the Hillary Room. merrily Jun 2015 #38
Well I was going to post some differences too AndreaCG Jun 2015 #52
You mean they didn't try to claim it's like Dukakis? Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2015 #19
Silly season starts earlier every election cycle. n/t Cracklin Charlie Jun 2015 #20
Yup. People started asking me to say I would vote for Hillary almost a year ago. merrily Jun 2015 #39
I have been quite impressed SmittynMo Jun 2015 #21
That's a very nice comment demwing Jun 2015 #29
This is the one thing that worries me about the difference between now and 1972 dflprincess Jun 2015 #22
Then we'll repeat the election from 4 years previous. jeff47 Jun 2015 #30
And poor old Hubert was a better choice in '68 dflprincess Jun 2015 #33
"Democrats are not worried about the left. The left has nowhere else to go." merrily Jun 2015 #45
1972 was when average family income peaked; also the value of the minimum wage eridani Jun 2015 #24
Well struck! immoderate Jun 2015 #32
After World War II and the Korean War, the war tax continued. merrily Jun 2015 #46
I believe that 1974 was my top year... k8conant Feb 2016 #77
Kicked and recommended a whole bunch! Great post! Enthusiast Jun 2015 #25
The generation that fought WWII isn't watching its offspring burn their draft cards and merrily Jun 2015 #26
Funny thing about these McGovern warnings... rbnyc Jun 2015 #27
Yes, that is the rationale jeff47 Jun 2015 #31
Also, she is obviously (to me, anyway) the choice of the Party and some merrily Jun 2015 #40
I don't know if he himself was inspirational. merrily Jun 2015 #36
Did anyone mention the war, Eagleton, a Democratic Congress and these other things? merrily Jun 2015 #42
So as Nixon had a perfect storm in 1972 demwing Jun 2015 #43
You're welcome. merrily Jun 2015 #44
kick kentuck Jun 2015 #47
Recommend madokie Jun 2015 #48
Yes things are very different now dreamnightwind Jun 2015 #50
K&R Scuba Jun 2015 #51
k&R azmom Jun 2015 #53
So much truth. hifiguy Jun 2015 #54
K&R! peacebird Jun 2015 #55
K & R x 1,000,000 Dont call me Shirley Jun 2015 #56
I was going to say "you are so right" passiveporcupine Jun 2015 #57
k & r. Thanks for posting. nm rhett o rick Jun 2015 #58
A DUer whose posts I cannot find right now pointed out to me that Rove used both merrily Aug 2015 #59
Great post, we could add a few more things to that list, but I think you made the point with this sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #60
Sanders campaign reminds me of McGovern Gothmog Sep 2015 #61
So support Hillary demwing Sep 2015 #62
According to that online quiz/test, Sanders is closer to my views than Hillary Gothmog Sep 2015 #63
Right, and that explains why you're comparing Bernie to McGovern demwing Sep 2015 #64
I worked on and remember the McGovern campaign Gothmog Sep 2015 #65
Are you saying that these are the reasons McGovern lost? demwing Sep 2015 #66
The reasons that McGovern lost are not on the poster Gothmog Sep 2015 #67
Nixon won demwing Sep 2015 #68
Really? Gothmog Sep 2015 #69
We do. It's loads of fun. Sleep well supporting Hillary. merrily Sep 2015 #71
+1 merrily Sep 2015 #70
+1 Jenny_92808 Feb 2016 #74
No worries here. chervilant Dec 2015 #72
People are still, just about daily, LiberalElite Feb 2016 #75
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»This Ain't 1972»Reply #0