Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Populist Reform of the Democratic Party
Showing Original Post only (View all)This Ain't 1972 [View all]
Last edited Wed Jun 17, 2015, 07:19 PM - Edit history (2)
I just read a post here on DU where a kindly soul warned us all that Bernie Sanders was our modern George McGovern, having absolutely zero chances of winning an election.
Though I'm sure that the warning was given out of the goodness of his/her heart I started counting all the ways that this election was like that election.
What a task! I had to stop when I got to Zero!
I just don't see how 2016 compares to 1972...we've lived through a generation of profound changes since that year. As Bill Nye the Science Guy used to say: "Consider the following..."
- In 1972, a black man had no chance of running for the Presidency, let alone winning it twice.
- In 1972, a woman had no chance of getting the Democratic party nomination, let alone being the front runner.
- In 1972, being in favor of gay marriage was a career killer.
- In 1972, banks were regulated and couldn't destroy the economy.
- In 1972, we had not already lived through 20-30 years of trickle down economics.
- In 1972, there was no Citizens United to act as a lightning rod.
- In 1972, there wasn't a clown car full of insane Republicans running against us (and each other).
- In 1972, there was no Internet to organize the troops.
- In 1972, these thing's didn't all come together to create a perfect storm for populist reform.
- Most importantly, in 1972 we didn't have Bernie Sanders to kick some corporate ass!
So hey all you worry warriors? While we appreciate your sincere concerns, we really don't share them.
This ain't 1972. Bernie Sanders isn't repeating history. He's making history.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
77 replies, 23946 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (124)
ReplyReply to this post
77 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
He did a great job on that role. Especially when you consider his other big role that year....
Spitfire of ATJ
Jun 2015
#35
I never saw that. Every actor I've heard speak of him says he was a genius actor, though.
merrily
Jun 2015
#37
I also did, but don't think I got a response.. what's the possibility I missed something?
Volaris
Jun 2015
#15
On June 17, 1972, Nixon's henchmen were burglarizing Democratic HQ in Watergate building
LiberalEsto
Jun 2015
#3
Heck, IMO Bernie is MORE electable in the general election than HRC...
ReallyIAmAnOptimist
Jun 2015
#8
Yup. People started asking me to say I would vote for Hillary almost a year ago.
merrily
Jun 2015
#39
This is the one thing that worries me about the difference between now and 1972
dflprincess
Jun 2015
#22
The generation that fought WWII isn't watching its offspring burn their draft cards and
merrily
Jun 2015
#26
Did anyone mention the war, Eagleton, a Democratic Congress and these other things?
merrily
Jun 2015
#42
A DUer whose posts I cannot find right now pointed out to me that Rove used both
merrily
Aug 2015
#59