Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nenagh

(1,925 posts)
9. I've just read the portion of the TPP from the above...
Sun Feb 1, 2015, 09:37 AM
Feb 2015

but in the environment & labour sections above (para 1 & 3), the initial portions of the sentences seem to promise "Unicorns" in both the environment & labour sectors..

but the last portion of the sentences, in each case, seem to say that if there is a dispute about the "Unicorns" (whether they become strong, people friendly Unicorns or weakened, Trojan Horse-type Unicorns)

that the settlement of those disputes shall be SUBJECT TO the SAME "Dispute Settlement Mechanism"

If the TPP has been written by corporate lawyers for their clients.. one wonders what is written into the dispute settlement mechanism that may preserve the labour rights we already have.. or current environmental protections etc..

So, as the OP says...flowery rhetoric everywhere...but what does it really mean vs the regulations/ laws that will determine whether the final product is a unicorn, a ghost of a unicorn or an anti-unicorn.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

From what I gather, Newest Reality Jan 2015 #1
"subject to the same dispute settlement mechanism as other obligations in TPP" nenagh Jan 2015 #2
If people could only understand that what that means is not good for America JDPriestly Jan 2015 #4
The second paragraph- commitments to effectively enforce domestic environmental laws... nenagh Feb 2015 #7
The terrible catch is that a court that does not answer to our Congress or to us as a people JDPriestly Feb 2015 #13
Wonderful reply. nenagh Feb 2015 #15
Does that mean that corporate lawyers on their corporate court get to decide? stillwaiting Feb 2015 #8
I've just read the portion of the TPP from the above... nenagh Feb 2015 #9
Opposition to the TPP becomes very easy for me when considering ISDS. stillwaiting Feb 2015 #10
"It's like the beginning stages of a nightmarish dystopic sci-fi film." Dragonfli Feb 2015 #17
Exactly. nt Mnemosyne Jan 2015 #3
Thanks for posting and the links. Bookmark. JEB Jan 2015 #5
The melding of corporation and state. Ruling class government corporate corruption extraordinaire. L0oniX Jan 2015 #6
K&R! This post deserves hundreds of recommendations! Enthusiast Feb 2015 #11
kick navarth Feb 2015 #12
Why do they have to 'seek' any of this? We HAVE LAWS, period. Clearly the rhetoric is telling us sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #14
I know of one Duer that not only uses this rhetoric as "proof" of the Benevolence of the TTP Dragonfli Feb 2015 #16
Thank you very much for that. How refreshing to hear after coming from threads that rhett o rick Feb 2015 #18
I saw one OP that tried Quixotically to discuss the root cause of the mistaken beliefs Dragonfli Feb 2015 #19
I very much share your fears. nm rhett o rick Feb 2015 #21
Rec the OP and wish I could rec 1, 13, 16, 18, 19... (nt) antiquie Feb 2015 #20
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»The Government’s TPP Rhet...»Reply #9