Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Populist Reform of the Democratic Party
Showing Original Post only (View all)The Government’s TPP Rhetoric (code for bullshit) [View all]
The definition of rhetoric is Language designed to have persuasive or impressive effect, but which is often regarded as lacking in sincerity or meaningful content. (www.oxforddictionaries.com/) Or just a fancy way of saying bullshit.
Rhetoric is very common in politics so it shouldn't be surprising to find the governments website that explains the Trans-Pacific Partnership or TPP choked full of it. (https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/trans-pacific-partnership/tpp-chapter-chapter-negotiating-5)
This site is a tremendous example of empty rhetoric. Lets look at some:
Pertaining to the environment:
Specifically, in the TPP we are seeking:
Strong and enforceable environment obligations, subject to the same dispute settlement mechanism as other obligations in TPP;
Commitments to effectively enforce domestic environmental laws, including laws that implement multilateral environmental agreements, and commitments not to waive or derogate from the protections afforded in environmental laws for the purpose of encouraging trade or investment;
Pertaining to Labor:
Specifically, in the TPP we are seeking:
Requirements to adhere to fundamental labor rights as recognized by the International Labor Organization, as well as acceptable conditions of work, subject to the same dispute settlement mechanism as other obligations in TPP;
Rules that will ensure that TPP countries do not waive or derogate from labor laws in a manner that affects trade or investment, including in free trade zones, and that they take initiatives to discourage trade in goods produced by forced labor;
Specifically, in the TPP we are seeking:
Strong and enforceable environment obligations, subject to the same dispute settlement mechanism as other obligations in TPP;
Commitments to effectively enforce domestic environmental laws, including laws that implement multilateral environmental agreements, and commitments not to waive or derogate from the protections afforded in environmental laws for the purpose of encouraging trade or investment;
Pertaining to Labor:
Specifically, in the TPP we are seeking:
Requirements to adhere to fundamental labor rights as recognized by the International Labor Organization, as well as acceptable conditions of work, subject to the same dispute settlement mechanism as other obligations in TPP;
Rules that will ensure that TPP countries do not waive or derogate from labor laws in a manner that affects trade or investment, including in free trade zones, and that they take initiatives to discourage trade in goods produced by forced labor;
This is empty rhetoric. It is lacking in sincerity or meaningful content
It does not say that the agreement will include any of these wonderful things, only that they will seek them.
Will they insist that these good things be included before its signed, HELL NO.
Let me know when you can assure me that the agreement will protect the environment, labor, and all of our concerns.
21 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The second paragraph- commitments to effectively enforce domestic environmental laws...
nenagh
Feb 2015
#7
The terrible catch is that a court that does not answer to our Congress or to us as a people
JDPriestly
Feb 2015
#13
Does that mean that corporate lawyers on their corporate court get to decide?
stillwaiting
Feb 2015
#8
The melding of corporation and state. Ruling class government corporate corruption extraordinaire.
L0oniX
Jan 2015
#6
Why do they have to 'seek' any of this? We HAVE LAWS, period. Clearly the rhetoric is telling us
sabrina 1
Feb 2015
#14
I know of one Duer that not only uses this rhetoric as "proof" of the Benevolence of the TTP
Dragonfli
Feb 2015
#16
Thank you very much for that. How refreshing to hear after coming from threads that
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#18
I saw one OP that tried Quixotically to discuss the root cause of the mistaken beliefs
Dragonfli
Feb 2015
#19