Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Populist Reform of the Democratic Party
In reply to the discussion: Suppose Elizabeth Warren posted on DU under an assumed name [View all]Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)34. YES, the battle of words needs to come into focus... linguistics are "free" to all
What you said here is ESSENTIAL!
Rather than be upset by them, I agree with you, we should study them. I have been doing that for a long time actually.
Sincere people don't need talking points, they speak in their own words, so whenever I see someone parroting these talking points, I know who they are.
Sincere people don't need talking points, they speak in their own words, so whenever I see someone parroting these talking points, I know who they are.
It is so true that "Sincere people don't need talking points, they speak in their own words..."
Unfortunately being sincere is not always accurate or helpful.
Plenty of right-wingers, like values voters, are VERY sincere, yikes!
Condensing and consolidating term and effectively communicating values
is the most impactful and cost effective thing Populist can do to create change.
Advertisers have already done the research, the facts are in.
Edward Bernays has provided the definitive road map
to the public subconscious.
In reality a large swath of the public is "irrational".
Moving those voters one way or another requires effective messaging.
The Populists absolutely need to get busy defining themselves or risk oblivion.
If there is any doubt look at how loosely progressive is defined and how liberal
has been turned into a quasi-pejorative in the MSM
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I would not heckle or challenge or nitpick anyone in any group. I am not going to the John Kerry
merrily
Jan 2015
#40
Plus "in bed with" is an idiom; any minimally educated person understands that
Divernan
Jan 2015
#55
YES, the battle of words needs to come into focus... linguistics are "free" to all
Cosmic Kitten
Dec 2014
#34
The Fair Deal did okay, as did the Great Society. The "War on Women" refrain helped a lot of
merrily
Jan 2015
#37
I was replying to your post 34, which specified "battle," so I used the same word you had used.
merrily
Jan 2015
#43
Does how anyone on a message board would react in a post matter in the real world?
merrily
Jan 2015
#36
Sure, but we're talking Senator Warren. In the real world, she has more power than any poster.
merrily
Jan 2015
#45
People who are sorry don't continue the same behavior they are supposedly sorry about.
merrily
Jan 2015
#53
Still won't stop? Fine. Typically, board owners, mods and hosts deal with trolls.
merrily
Jan 2015
#56
I give at least even odds that if anonymous, Obama himself would draw a ban on the wrong day.
TheKentuckian
Mar 2015
#61