Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Populist Reform of the Democratic Party
In reply to the discussion: THE HARD CHOICE [View all]bearssoapbox
(1,408 posts)51. Well said!
I don't usually answer those type of replies because it doesn't do any good since they can't, or won't, differentiate the differences.
It's gotten old explaining it to people for the past 20-30-40 yrs.
So I want to THANK YOU for taking the time and effort to do it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
114 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Because you can't accept her admission about being wrong, doesn't diminish the fact that she said it
tonyt53
Jun 2016
#1
Best case is she was wrong. That means she has terrible judgement. That's her best case.
Scuba
Jun 2016
#2
Me too. On all counts. Except for Dennis. But only because Dennis was already eliminated before the
Enthusiast
Jun 2016
#71
before Reagan, college was free in Cali. thanks for endorsing Reagan.
ish of the hammer
Jun 2016
#10
yes, you are right, the rich are getting even more rich, the MIC commands even more of our
ish of the hammer
Jun 2016
#62
AND the jobs for the future are getting more expensive to train people to do
jmowreader
Jun 2016
#86
no, you need to lower or eliminate education costs, you need single payer health
larkrake
Jun 2016
#89
I'm 73. Tuition was low and health care insurance was mostly non-profit and thus cheaper when I was
JDPriestly
Jun 2016
#11
And the military actions have only enriched the few already wealthy while destabilizing
Enthusiast
Jun 2016
#78
I doubt if the conservative Democrats would even read what you posted. Their life is simple,
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#101
Well, fuck me. Hillary paid her dues, working for the party... Debbie, Nancy and all the loyal party
Hoppy
Jun 2016
#6
She says she made a mistake, but what was the mistake? Putting corp profits before
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#15
I want whatever your taking. Ah to just always vote Democrat and not at all be bothered by
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#30
First of all we are still in the Primary. Second, I wonder if you've ever gotten
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#114
Thanks. I hope this Group is a place where Progressive can discuss issues with
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#108
Yes and since he is the ruler of DU it's his way or the hiway. But how sad that you know so
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#34
it's the Iran-Contra dilemma: if Reagan was complicit he should be removed, if he was uninvolved
MisterP
Jun 2016
#42
almost every decision during the "Ronald" Reagan presidency was made through Joan Quigley
MisterP
Jun 2016
#49
She didn't "trust" them, she agreed with their agenda and has been aptly rewarded since. nm
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#107
Very few people supported the war in Iraq, we all knew it was a lie from the start, only a few
larkrake
Jun 2016
#90
She was wrong. What does it matter how many others were wrong? She saw the
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#105
"We only want to protect our women, what does it matter if we hate transgenders or not?"
Amimnoch
Jun 2016
#109
I honestly don't understand it either. How can Clinton-Sachs put MIC profits ahead of
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#103