Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Populist Reform of the Democratic Party
In reply to the discussion: THE HARD CHOICE [View all]marble falls
(62,047 posts)18. Or putting her time in to run for the inevitable run for the Oval?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
114 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Because you can't accept her admission about being wrong, doesn't diminish the fact that she said it
tonyt53
Jun 2016
#1
Best case is she was wrong. That means she has terrible judgement. That's her best case.
Scuba
Jun 2016
#2
Me too. On all counts. Except for Dennis. But only because Dennis was already eliminated before the
Enthusiast
Jun 2016
#71
before Reagan, college was free in Cali. thanks for endorsing Reagan.
ish of the hammer
Jun 2016
#10
yes, you are right, the rich are getting even more rich, the MIC commands even more of our
ish of the hammer
Jun 2016
#62
AND the jobs for the future are getting more expensive to train people to do
jmowreader
Jun 2016
#86
no, you need to lower or eliminate education costs, you need single payer health
larkrake
Jun 2016
#89
I'm 73. Tuition was low and health care insurance was mostly non-profit and thus cheaper when I was
JDPriestly
Jun 2016
#11
And the military actions have only enriched the few already wealthy while destabilizing
Enthusiast
Jun 2016
#78
I doubt if the conservative Democrats would even read what you posted. Their life is simple,
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#101
Well, fuck me. Hillary paid her dues, working for the party... Debbie, Nancy and all the loyal party
Hoppy
Jun 2016
#6
She says she made a mistake, but what was the mistake? Putting corp profits before
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#15
I want whatever your taking. Ah to just always vote Democrat and not at all be bothered by
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#30
First of all we are still in the Primary. Second, I wonder if you've ever gotten
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#114
Thanks. I hope this Group is a place where Progressive can discuss issues with
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#108
Yes and since he is the ruler of DU it's his way or the hiway. But how sad that you know so
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#34
it's the Iran-Contra dilemma: if Reagan was complicit he should be removed, if he was uninvolved
MisterP
Jun 2016
#42
almost every decision during the "Ronald" Reagan presidency was made through Joan Quigley
MisterP
Jun 2016
#49
She didn't "trust" them, she agreed with their agenda and has been aptly rewarded since. nm
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#107
Very few people supported the war in Iraq, we all knew it was a lie from the start, only a few
larkrake
Jun 2016
#90
She was wrong. What does it matter how many others were wrong? She saw the
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#105
"We only want to protect our women, what does it matter if we hate transgenders or not?"
Amimnoch
Jun 2016
#109
I honestly don't understand it either. How can Clinton-Sachs put MIC profits ahead of
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#103