Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
1. Of course.
Thu May 1, 2014, 05:58 PM
May 2014

The United States decides, unilaterally, that certain individuals in Yemen constitute an "imminent threat" and so we drop missiles on them.

When those missiles kill innocent women and children who happen to be in the vicinity of the "imminent threat", Americans reflexively justify the "collateral damage" as "necessary" to "protect our freedom."

Because our "freedom," which is in no way threatened by the Yemeni tribesman we killed, is so much more important than those women and children. Hell, we don't even bother to learn their names. But one blond American girl goes missing in Aruba - wall-to-wall coverage, 24-7.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Progressive Media Resources Group»Does Our Zeal to Support ...»Reply #1