Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Elizabeth Warren
In reply to the discussion: Jay Leno on Warren vs. Hillary: I Don’t See Hillary’s ‘Fire’ Anymore [View all]RiverLover
(7,830 posts)57. Sorry, tell Hillary that Elizabeth Warren already used the 90% figure. I know imitation is the
sincerest form of flattery, but its still insulting to the intelligence of the informed Democrat.
Senator Warren's Remarks at AFL-CIO National Summit on Raising Wages
...Coming out of the Great Depression, America built a middle class unlike anything seen on earth. From the 1930s to the late 1970s, as GDP went up, wages went up pretty much across the board. In fact, 90% of all workers-everyone outside the top 10%-got about 70% of all the new income growth.(v) Sure, the richest 10% gobbled up more than their share-they got 30%. But overall, as the economic pie got bigger, pretty much everyone was getting a little more. In other words, as our country got richer, our families got richer. And as our families got richer, our country got richer. That was how this country built a great middle class.
But then things changed.
By 1980, wages had flattened out, while expenses kept going up. The squeeze was terrible. In the early 2000s, families were spending twice as much, adjusted for inflation, on mortgages as they had a generation earlier. They spent more on health insurance, and more to send their kids to college. Mom and dad both went to work, but that meant new expenses like childcare, higher taxes, and the costs of a second car. All over the country, people tightened their belts where they could, but it still hasn't been enough to save them. Families have gone deep into debt to pay for college, to cover serious medical problems, or just to stay afloat a while longer.(vi) And today's young adults may be the first generation in American history to end up, as a group, with less than their parents.(vii)
Remember how up until 1980, 90% of all people-middle class, working people, poor people-got about 70% of all the new income that was created in the economy and the top 10% took the rest? Since 1980, guess how much of the growth in income the 90% got? Nothing. None. Zero. In fact, it's worse than that. The average family not in the top 10% makes less money than a generation ago.(viii) So who got the increase in income over the last 32 years? 100% of it went to the top ten percent. All of the new money earned in this economy over the past generation-all that growth in the GDP-went to the top.(ix) All of it.
That is a huge structural change...
http://www.warren.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=696
...Coming out of the Great Depression, America built a middle class unlike anything seen on earth. From the 1930s to the late 1970s, as GDP went up, wages went up pretty much across the board. In fact, 90% of all workers-everyone outside the top 10%-got about 70% of all the new income growth.(v) Sure, the richest 10% gobbled up more than their share-they got 30%. But overall, as the economic pie got bigger, pretty much everyone was getting a little more. In other words, as our country got richer, our families got richer. And as our families got richer, our country got richer. That was how this country built a great middle class.
But then things changed.
By 1980, wages had flattened out, while expenses kept going up. The squeeze was terrible. In the early 2000s, families were spending twice as much, adjusted for inflation, on mortgages as they had a generation earlier. They spent more on health insurance, and more to send their kids to college. Mom and dad both went to work, but that meant new expenses like childcare, higher taxes, and the costs of a second car. All over the country, people tightened their belts where they could, but it still hasn't been enough to save them. Families have gone deep into debt to pay for college, to cover serious medical problems, or just to stay afloat a while longer.(vi) And today's young adults may be the first generation in American history to end up, as a group, with less than their parents.(vii)
Remember how up until 1980, 90% of all people-middle class, working people, poor people-got about 70% of all the new income that was created in the economy and the top 10% took the rest? Since 1980, guess how much of the growth in income the 90% got? Nothing. None. Zero. In fact, it's worse than that. The average family not in the top 10% makes less money than a generation ago.(viii) So who got the increase in income over the last 32 years? 100% of it went to the top ten percent. All of the new money earned in this economy over the past generation-all that growth in the GDP-went to the top.(ix) All of it.
That is a huge structural change...
http://www.warren.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=696
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Jay Leno on Warren vs. Hillary: I Don’t See Hillary’s ‘Fire’ Anymore [View all]
RiverLover
Jan 2015
OP
Seeing as he has been a GOP asskisser for many, many years, now, I have to agree with you.
MADem
Jan 2015
#64
If memory serves me jay Leno backed Arnold for governor in our state. So much
still_one
Jan 2015
#27
He didn't just "back" Ahhh-nuld...he gave his show over as a platform for Ahhh-nee to announce his
MADem
Jan 2015
#65
He's right on the difference between Hillary and Liz. In fact I haven't even heard much from Hillary
Autumn
Jan 2015
#3
Which is why we need Elizabeth Warren to run. She would be a more interesting, more
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#22
Wouldn't you think it strange if Hillary was going to congress on regular basis and giving fiery
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#7
I would imagine if Hillary wanted to get her views out there it would be very easy for
Autumn
Jan 2015
#9
There's no shortage of places where The Inevitable One can give fiery speeches
MannyGoldstein
Jan 2015
#10
Oh, I forgot, she gets paid big bucks for her speeches, now who is smart, do you get big bucks for
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#13
Well, she doesn't have a job and as we have discussed I think something is better than nothing.
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#28
I don't object to her speaking fees, I don't object to her book income. I own her books,
Autumn
Jan 2015
#34
Okay, you are an intelligent, how many people do you think is going to be helped by indicting every
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#35
I don't give a fuck about indicting every one who might be connected to financial world.
Autumn
Jan 2015
#36
Which side are you on, either you want to see the working people helped or you are interested in
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#38
No I did not help her write the tweet but am trying to point out more working people needs help
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#44
What is offensive is Hillary taking millions from banks and then talking about caring about the
RiverLover
Jan 2015
#46
Yes you seem to be falling in line with attacking the finanical companies just letting the
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#48
I'm sorry, but to me the middle class is the working class. This trying to divide them up doesn't
RiverLover
Jan 2015
#50
You are entitled to your opinion, I am going to hope somebody tries to help the 90%.
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#54
Sorry, tell Hillary that Elizabeth Warren already used the 90% figure. I know imitation is the
RiverLover
Jan 2015
#57
I was involved in the union struggles of the 80's, brought on by the trickle down economics of
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#60
Let me tell you this, i am a part of the working poor, I did not see an exclusion,
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#47
The exclusion is there. Hillary is an educated woman, she knows the difference between
Autumn
Jan 2015
#49
So if Hillary should get wages up and get some programs which jobs are created are you going to
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#53
Any democrat who is considering running for the party's nomination for President and
Autumn
Jan 2015
#19
It's true, even here at DU. Hillary threads are just so so, while Liz and Bernie light up the board.
TheNutcracker
Jan 2015
#26
You should write an OP telling us all about Hillary's fire. I'm sure YOU must see some fire in her.
Autumn
Jan 2015
#52
You have no reading comprehension. Please post the name of the person who wrote the OP.
Autumn
Jan 2015
#61
I don't believe any supporter of Liz's would go into the Hillary group and behave in
Autumn
Jan 2015
#63
Not a Hillary fan, but think she had to work to get rid of that "fire" to become Sec of State.
libdem4life
Jan 2015
#55