Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Interfaith Group
In reply to the discussion: We need to have a discussion about the rules [View all]el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)32. OK
Well I agree that they shouldn't be treated with suspicion - but I also don't think we need to wear rose colored glasses. Oftentimes we do disagree, and papering over those disagreements isn't a worthwhile pursuit.
You understand that Mormons don't call it "magic underwear" right?
Bryant
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think it goes deeper than a discussion of the rules to what the purpose of this forum is
el_bryanto
Dec 2014
#23
I don't agree that they have been patient enough. I think that people have been banned for
el_bryanto
Dec 2014
#27
I'm not sure what part of my statement you don't buy. It seems we are on the same page
el_bryanto
Dec 2014
#30
I don't buy that atheists are automatically antagonistic toward religion...
TreasonousBastard
Dec 2014
#31
"friendly and respectful" would be far better than "tolerant" and "civil" and "positive" because
carolinayellowdog
Dec 2014
#44