Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Interfaith Group
In reply to the discussion: Well that's three. Three to go. [View all]LostOne4Ever
(9,597 posts)92. Why? All that will do is cause a fight.
I am not pursuing a grudge. I am just not responding to him. That is the definition of not pursuing a grudge.
If others would have pursued a similar course of action this OP would not be here.
I responded to you because you said that was a good question. My participation in this thread was over till you said that. So I gave you an answer. And hopefully this thread end with this post.
Take care
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
96 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think you are going to need a thread for those of us who demand to be blocked
kdmorris
Aug 2014
#60
How about if I self block - just agree not to post here anymore. Would that satisfy you? nt
el_bryanto
Aug 2014
#53
He should have stopped after being assured that it really was homophobia.
Htom Sirveaux
Aug 2014
#55
My point is that I know I wouldn't and they knew their presence would be equally disruptive.
hrmjustin
Aug 2014
#41
I thank you for your standing with him but it is time to stop posting about this.
hrmjustin
Aug 2014
#68
Leader might be stretching it - but he is held up as the "representative" atheist by some believers
el_bryanto
Aug 2014
#94
Well I think it was honestly said but the members of AA have to realize we can discuss him
hrmjustin
Aug 2014
#81