Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Interfaith Group
In reply to the discussion: Well that's three. Three to go. [View all]Htom Sirveaux
(1,242 posts)2. Except now we have a problem.
People were banned from here for their responses to you. But if your statements were themselves out of line, what does fairness dictate? I'm not in charge of anything, but it seems like the remedy needs to be either that they get unbanned and receive apologies, or that you get what they got.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
96 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think you are going to need a thread for those of us who demand to be blocked
kdmorris
Aug 2014
#60
How about if I self block - just agree not to post here anymore. Would that satisfy you? nt
el_bryanto
Aug 2014
#53
He should have stopped after being assured that it really was homophobia.
Htom Sirveaux
Aug 2014
#55
My point is that I know I wouldn't and they knew their presence would be equally disruptive.
hrmjustin
Aug 2014
#41
I thank you for your standing with him but it is time to stop posting about this.
hrmjustin
Aug 2014
#68
Leader might be stretching it - but he is held up as the "representative" atheist by some believers
el_bryanto
Aug 2014
#94
Well I think it was honestly said but the members of AA have to realize we can discuss him
hrmjustin
Aug 2014
#81