Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

flamin lib

(14,559 posts)
21. 50% is sufficient if you don't actively violate the sop.
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 07:16 PM
Mar 2015

Like a suggested reg? Log in with support. Think its a bad idea perhaps suggestions for improvement will be better than outright rejection.

My problem with nullification laws is that they create an adversarial relationship between the Fed and the State. If states can opt out of enforcement and the Fed has to come in and over ride the state law enforcement we set up a "jack booted thug/black helicopter" scenario.

There is a grey area, its called prosecutorial discretion. Yeah the law says x but we'll just let it slide for now. It happens at all levels of law enforcement. It's still confusing but it allows for some discretion on a case by case basis at both federal and state level. That's how CO gets MJ and Obama gets immigration.

OK, don't like fed gun laws? Just ignore them but don't pass a law forbidding their enforcement. You may change your mind so why cut off your nose to spite your face?

Hope this is more coherant than it looks to me at first pass . . .

Good. We need to be taking powers away from the police, not giving them more bluestateguy Feb 2015 #1
From the article: flamin lib Feb 2015 #2
our government goes overseas WDIM Feb 2015 #4
WTF?????? nt flamin lib Feb 2015 #6
States do not have to enforce federal law. WDIM Feb 2015 #3
I take it you have a problem with disarming convicted violent felons, flamin lib Feb 2015 #5
no i dont have a problem with it. WDIM Feb 2015 #7
You're being completely ridiculous. flamin lib Feb 2015 #8
I do WDIM Feb 2015 #9
"as long as the government has guns so should the people." Electric Monk Feb 2015 #11
Yes, they were a much better fit in the gungeon with their "until the gov't disarms, everyone should Electric Monk Feb 2015 #12
The NRA influence is strong billh58 Feb 2015 #10
Just to note: NutmegYankee Feb 2015 #13
I will wish for fewer gun deaths. flamin lib Feb 2015 #14
I support greater personal liberties for the people NutmegYankee Feb 2015 #15
All good and notable goals, except billh58 Feb 2015 #16
I was pointing out that the OP position may have unintended consequences. NutmegYankee Feb 2015 #17
The entire right-wing Teabilly billh58 Feb 2015 #18
I don't follow how you get to that point? NutmegYankee Feb 2015 #19
My wish is for more gun control, but the parent is absolutely correct. sir pball Mar 2015 #20
50% is sufficient if you don't actively violate the sop. flamin lib Mar 2015 #21
Thanks for accommodating… sir pball Mar 2015 #22
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»Inside The Conservative C...»Reply #21