Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control Reform Activism
In reply to the discussion: "Gabrielle Giffords Gun Control Super PAC Raises $6.5 Million" [View all]Robb
(39,665 posts)42. Incorrect. The current count of people blocked is 40.
There are only 23 active members blocked from this group. The rest were banned from DU by admin or MIRT at some point after they were blocked here, so you can perhaps imagine how we feel our own process of blocking disruptive members is effective and useful.
In the event you do not have access to the hosts forum, and in the interest of transparency, they were:
Remmah2
markeybrown
skinnytrees
WinniSkipper
Peter cotton
holdencaufield
Trunk Monkey
dklo
Family Man
slackmaster
CokeMachine
DemDealer
JohnnyBoots
supernaut
grok
MalcomInTheMiddle
ceonupe
markeybrown
skinnytrees
WinniSkipper
Peter cotton
holdencaufield
Trunk Monkey
dklo
Family Man
slackmaster
CokeMachine
DemDealer
JohnnyBoots
supernaut
grok
MalcomInTheMiddle
ceonupe
There are many DU gun owners who have not been blocked from this group. Those gun owners support the SOP of this group, e.g. broadly speaking they support gun safety legislation and progressive gun control groups. This is not complicated; we don't want to debate whether gun safety legislation is a worthwhile goal, we want to discuss ways to accomplish it.
I'm happy to hear you support UBC. In this group we're seeking to examine ways to get this and other gun safety legislation efforts passed at the state and federal level. Not whether those efforts are worthwhile, because we all feel they are. If we have to spend all our time defending that, we cannot discuss implementing; those who make us do so, here, are disruptive.
Finally, I had to chuckle that you complained we wanted a protected group to discuss a particular viewpoint, then complained you weren't adequately protected from it elsewhere. Perhaps you should ask admin for a protected pro-gun group, if you weren't being intentionally ironic.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
75 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I will gladly admit I am one who thinks the Second Amendment IS the problem and needs to be
CTyankee
Aug 2013
#3
sadly, we get the "pesky 2nd Amendment" song and dance from gun lovers here, which is why I am
CTyankee
Aug 2013
#5
Honestly, I was going through my old photos, growing up in Texas...picture after picture
CTyankee
Aug 2013
#27
Notice how there are NO "reasonable" gun owners here at DU who claim to be in favor of gun safety
CTyankee
Aug 2013
#11
I also love the way they "reject" the NRA, often saying they were once members but no more.
CTyankee
Aug 2013
#14
There are reasons for the divide. A major reason is the belief I hold and several others here hold,
CTyankee
Aug 2013
#36
I own an "arsenal" that would make you blanch and I'm quite in favor of new laws thx.
sir pball
Aug 2013
#53