Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
11. I didn't say researchers thought any such thing
Sun Mar 17, 2013, 12:44 PM
Mar 2013

I didn't say any independent researchers didn't think there was a link. I said independent researchers AFAIK have not found cause and effect. I did not even say independent researchers attempted to try to find such a link. The OP did not say there was cause and effect. It simply said gun laws are associated with gun death, which are mostly suicides. Those are two different things.
A better map would be one based on ownership rate, which is harder to determine, would be better than by who has stricter laws. For example, in terms of gun ownership Florida, California, Delaware and Maryland are about the same.

Using the "fewer suicides" argument has two big risks. Saying "stricter laws will reduce gun suicides" will beg the question "what about those of other means, don't they matter?" The other risk is that once laws are in place, and the gun suicides do indeed drop, but the suicide rate does not. You would have much less credibility when wanting to close "remaining loopholes". From there, one would have to ask "what about those other common suicide means?" If nothing, why not if suicide prevention is the goal?

The person I replied to someone who asked why suicides and daily gang violence, which is more common, is used as less of a rational than the relatively rare spree shooting. That is a good question. I think I gave a fairly good answer within your SOP, according to six DUers. It was also my honest opinion.
BTW, those are written by the same people

Geez could there be MORE gun deaths in Chicago and DC were it not for these gun laws? dkf Mar 2013 #1
Gang-related shootings are a tiny fraction of homicides. Robb Mar 2013 #2
Since most gun deaths are suicides it is curious this is not the main rationale for gun control. dkf Mar 2013 #4
The real answer to your questions is simply out of sight out of mind. gejohnston Mar 2013 #6
FYI: AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service aikoaiko Mar 2013 #7
LOL. Looks like the NRA talking points have found their way into this forum. DanTex Mar 2013 #8
Hemenway isn't taken that seriously gejohnston Mar 2013 #9
Not taken seriously by who? He's a Harvard professor with an extensive publication record. DanTex Mar 2013 #10
I didn't say researchers thought any such thing gejohnston Mar 2013 #11
In other words, you can't name a single researcher who agrees with you. DanTex Mar 2013 #12
I said none have found, AFAIK gejohnston Mar 2013 #14
Umm, you said "they don't seem to be accepted by serious researchers" (post 6) DanTex Mar 2013 #16
I also used the qualifier "seemed" gejohnston Mar 2013 #17
You need to look up the word "mostly". DanTex Mar 2013 #18
he is the most cited on your list gejohnston Mar 2013 #19
Do you ever say anything true? "DA Brent" is first author on 9 of the studies. DanTex Mar 2013 #20
your point? gejohnston Mar 2013 #21
you oppose gun control, why are you here? CreekDog Apr 2013 #23
Yes. Maybe even as much as New Orleans or St Louis. DanTex Mar 2013 #5
There are Illinois' state laws and statewide is lower than Indiana CreekDog Apr 2013 #24
Marking this for a later read. progressoid Mar 2013 #3
CDC puts US suicides by gun at approx. 20,000 in 2010 Progressive dog Mar 2013 #13
Going the root causes of the desire to commit suicide would help, too. There was a paragraph at the freshwest Mar 2013 #15
kick nt Electric Monk Apr 2013 #22
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»Science Confirms The Obvi...»Reply #11