Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Social Security & Medicare
In reply to the discussion: Social Security: The Best and Worst Years To Be Born [View all]Shermann
(8,682 posts)23. I guess we're going there
Social Security follows English common law that finds that a person attains an age on the day before the birthday. So, your indexing year is the year you actually turn 59.
https://secure.ssa.gov/poms.nsf/lnx/0300615015
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sounds about right, I was born in 1949 and I'm very happy with my Social Security
Walleye
Jan 2024
#1
"The best birth year in the modern era? That would be 1949".. me too. My buddy who was born the same year
mitch96
Jan 2024
#40
IIRC, SS benefits were not taxed until St. Ronnie Raygun went on his mission to destroy the middle class.
OMGWTF
Jan 2024
#25
Lol. Thanks! Not sure whether that's a benefit or cost. I was curious mostly because in my younger years,
KPN
Jan 2024
#42
It is sort of a scale from 0 to 15 with zero being the best and 15 being the worst
Shermann
Jan 2024
#44
Right and if and when you make it to 76, it extends to 12.29 years instead of 11.97
Shermann
Jan 2024
#63
I, too, was born in '52. My social security was reduced by the amount I receive from Japan for the national pension
Martin68
Jan 2024
#33
On a sorta kinda positive note, you can't really lose money that you never had! nt
Shermann
Jan 2024
#45