Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
10. So are The Center for Budget Policy Priorities and the Center for American Progress
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 04:35 PM
Apr 2013

no longer Democrats? Or Progressives?

Because they endorse chained CPI. Yep.

Unlike DFA Stoka's (and other progressive PACs') misinformed insinuation, I still consider myself very much a Democrat.

The Chained CPI would create a minimum baseline for Social Security benefits so that no one who works their whole life has to live in poverty in their retirement. Now pay attention here: the minimum benefit would be above the poverty line, for the first time fulfilling the promise of Social Security to end elderly poverty and actually boosting benefits for the lowest wage workers, which the protectors of the Entitlement Status Quo {like Stoka} are effectively against.

Lo and behold, President Obama's proposal has received the endorsement by The Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, one of most well-respected liberal think tanks on policy analysis, and the Center for American Progress, Washington’s most powerful liberal think tank, the latter having recommended the chained CPI in its comprehensive Social Security reform plan.

Together with the chained CPI, President Obama's proposal will include savings {propagated as "cuts" by corporate media to frighten the masses} to Medicare (he's already expanded Medicaid through the Left and Rightwing fringes most hated program, ObamaCare}, and the package will do the following:


1: Add life to the Social Security and Medicare trust funds.
2: Wipe out poverty forever for the poorest when they retire after a lifetime of backbreaking, minimum wage work.
3: Force pharmaceutical companies to stop raiding our treasury for seniors' medications.
4: Ask the wealthiest seniors {you know? Like McCain} to pay a higher Medicare premium.
5: Close tax loopholes for the rich.
6: Institute universal preschool.

To do nothing, we are looking at a projected 25% cut in benefits in 2033, according to the SSA Trustee Report of 2012.

The president's proposal would also boost benefits at age 85. It would ensure that the people most at risk of running out of their savings are taken care of. Those in the greatest need would see their benefits increase under the president's proposal while closing tax loopholes for the wealthy, strengthen Medicare through savings. It will also institute universal Pre-K that, studies have shown {RAND Corporation and the Academy of Pediatrics studies} that for every dollar invested in early-childhood intervention, society reaps $7 in benefits in the form of reduced dropout rates, delayed pregnancy, reduced anti-social (criminal) behavior, etc.

HARD TIMES ON MAINSTREET(Original Song and Video) barryboomer Apr 2013 #1
cool Welcome to DU limpyhobbler Apr 2013 #3
Good song. ZombieHorde Apr 2013 #6
Great. Good voice. Good singing. Musical. Stirring. JDPriestly Apr 2013 #13
NEW CHEER!! Zoonart Apr 2013 #2
I Like... WillyT Apr 2013 #4
i agree or take it away completely. DesertFlower Apr 2013 #7
"You can't call yourself an American and Downwinder Apr 2013 #5
CORRECT Skittles Apr 2013 #8
K&R Teamster Jeff Apr 2013 #9
So are The Center for Budget Policy Priorities and the Center for American Progress BlueCaliDem Apr 2013 #10
What's it like living in bizzaro world? n/t L0oniX Apr 2013 #11
You tell me. You appear to be a permanent resident of. eom BlueCaliDem Apr 2013 #14
Wow you're going to wipe out poverty for ever by cutting social security? Awesome, sign me up. limpyhobbler Apr 2013 #15
That's not even remotely funny, and I take exception to that. BlueCaliDem Apr 2013 #17
There is only one way to change Social Security. JDPriestly Apr 2013 #16
There are actually TWO. The one you propose BlueCaliDem Apr 2013 #18
Read my post. JDPriestly Apr 2013 #19
Disabled people are scared as hell of this too unrepentant progress Apr 2013 #28
Yes. They are saying that the Obama proposal would increase JDPriestly Apr 2013 #30
But it's worse than that unrepentant progress Apr 2013 #31
Wow! Thanks for that comment. I hadn't thought of that. JDPriestly Apr 2013 #32
Honestly, I don't know if that's the intended effect... unrepentant progress Apr 2013 #33
Robert Riech, Center for Economic Policy Research & AARP say #noChainedCPI FogerRox Apr 2013 #23
But real inflation will overtake chainedCPI FogerRox Apr 2013 #24
Link? Babel_17 Apr 2013 #25
It's part of the chained CPI in the Center for American Progress report. BlueCaliDem Apr 2013 #29
Thank you but Babel_17 Apr 2013 #34
"The Chained CPI would create a minimum baseline for Social Security benefits..." unrepentant progress Apr 2013 #27
Please stop insulting us by confusing "poverty" with actual poverty in real life eridani Apr 2013 #35
IT is a militant organized working class nineteen50 Apr 2013 #12
+1 n/t whathehell Apr 2013 #36
"Obama Unleased!!!" was the horror of the Right Wing prior to the election... Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #20
Obama's Position Is Untenable -This Will Be The Last Straw For Many cantbeserious Apr 2013 #21
I kinda don't like anyone telling me what I can and can't call myself. classof56 Apr 2013 #22
I've said this before, and say it again: if EVER there was a time & place to draw line in sand 99th_Monkey Apr 2013 #26
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Social Security & Medicare»"You can't call yourself ...»Reply #10