Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nuclear Free

Warpy

(113,160 posts)

5. Yes, it's absolutely perfect and the plants never degrade and

Reply to davea0511 (Reply #4)

Fri Jun 8, 2012, 06:28 PM

Jun 2012

there is never any contaminated equipment and none of them is ever vulnerable to natural disaster no matter where they put them.

I suggest the need for reading is on your side.

I can see it as a transitional technology, nothing more.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What do you think of Thorium LFTR Nuclear Reactors? [View all] Bradical79 Jun 2012 OP

The main question is whether energy from thorium reactors really will be cheaper. PoliticAverse Jun 2012 #1

No, only has to be cleaner davea0511 Jun 2012 #3

I think they likely have most of the drawbacks of uranium reactors Warpy Jun 2012 #2

You really don't know what you're talking about davea0511 Jun 2012 #4

Yes, it's absolutely perfect and the plants never degrade and Warpy Jun 2012 #5

Do your homewrk, sarcasm doesn't advance the discsn, plenty of history and potential with Thorium eromni Jun 2012 #6

How do you mine Uranium or Thorium ore without creating CO2? madokie Nov 2012 #11

Military was NEVER interested in commercial reactors. PamW Jun 2012 #8

Simple differences LWR vs LFTR lernerconsulting Jun 2012 #7

very promising Maslo55 Jul 2012 #9

This message was self-deleted by its author Maslo55 Jul 2012 #10

good post mate antigop19667 Jan 2013 #12